ৱিকিপিডিয়া:ৱিকিপিডিয়া কি নহয়: বিভিন্ন সংশোধনসমূহৰ মাজৰ পাৰ্থক্য

আন্তঃৱিকি লিংক সম্পাদনা কৰক
অসমীয়া ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ পৰা
Browse history interactively
আগৰ সম্পাদনানতুন সম্পাদনা →
Content deleted Content added
ভিজুৱেলৱিকিপাঠ্য
No edit summary
102 নং শাৰী: 102 নং শাৰী:
Wikipedia is an encyclopedic reference, not an instruction manual, guidebook, or textbook. Wikipedia articles should not read like:
Wikipedia is an encyclopedic reference, not an instruction manual, guidebook, or textbook. Wikipedia articles should not read like:


# '''Instruction manuals.''' While Wikipedia has descriptions of people, places and things, an [[WP:WIAA|article]] should not read like a "how-to" style [[owners manual]], [[advice column]] ([[Wikipedia:Legal disclaimer|legal]], [[Wikipedia:Medical disclaimer|medical]] or otherwise) or [[suggestion box]]. This includes tutorials, walk-throughs, instruction manuals, game guides, and recipes.<ref>The how-to restriction does not apply to the [[Wikipedia:Project namespace|project namespace]], where [[:Category:Wikipedia how-to|"how-to"s relevant to editing Wikipedia itself]] are appropriate, such as [[Wikipedia:How to draw a diagram with Dia]]. Also, in the [[Wikipedia:Main namespace|main namespace]], describing to the reader how other people or things use something is encyclopedic; instructing the reader in the [[imperative mood]] about how to use something is not.</ref> If you are interested in a "how-to" type of manual, you may want to look at [[wikiHow]], [http://how-to.wikia.com/wiki/How_To How to Wiki] or our sister project, [[Wikibooks]].
# '''Instruction manuals.''' While Wikipedia has descriptions of people, places and things, an [[WP:WIAA|article]] should not read like a "how-to" style [[owners manual]], [[advice column]] ([[Wikipedia:Legal disclaimer|legal]], [[Wikipedia:Medical disclaimer|medical]] or otherwise) or [[suggestion box]]. This includes tutorials, walk-throughs, instruction manuals, game guides, and recipes.<ref>The how-to restriction does not apply to the [[Wikipedia:Project namespace|project namespace]], where [[:Category:Wikipedia how-to|"how-to"s relevant to editing Wikipedia itself]] are appropriate, such as [[Wikipedia:How to draw a diagram with Dia]]. Also, in the [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:মূল নামস্থান|মূল নামস্থান]], describing to the reader how other people or things use something is encyclopedic; instructing the reader in the [[imperative mood]] about how to use something is not.</ref> If you are interested in a "how-to" type of manual, you may want to look at [[wikiHow]], [http://how-to.wikia.com/wiki/How_To How to Wiki] or our sister project, [[Wikibooks]].
# '''Travel guides.''' An article on [[Paris]] should mention landmarks, such as the [[Eiffel Tower]] and the [[Louvre]], but not the telephone number or street address of your favorite hotel, nor the current price of a ''café au lait'' on the [[Champs-Élysées]]. Wikipedia is not the place to recreate content more suited to entries in hotel or culinary guides, travelogues, and the like. Notable locations may meet the inclusion criteria, but the resulting articles need not include every tourist attraction, restaurant, hotel or venue, etc. Such details may be welcome at [[Wikitravel]] or [http://travel.wikia.com/wiki/Wikia_Travel Wikia travel] instead.
# '''Travel guides.''' An article on [[Paris]] should mention landmarks, such as the [[Eiffel Tower]] and the [[Louvre]], but not the telephone number or street address of your favorite hotel, nor the current price of a ''café au lait'' on the [[Champs-Élysées]]. Wikipedia is not the place to recreate content more suited to entries in hotel or culinary guides, travelogues, and the like. Notable locations may meet the inclusion criteria, but the resulting articles need not include every tourist attraction, restaurant, hotel or venue, etc. Such details may be welcome at [[Wikitravel]] or [http://travel.wikia.com/wiki/Wikia_Travel Wikia travel] instead.
# '''Video game guides.''' An article about a [[computer game]] or [[video game]] should summarize the main actions the player does to win the game. But avoid lists of gameplay weapons, items, or concepts. Detailed coverage of specific point values, achievements, time-limits, levels, types of enemies, character moves, character weight classes, and so on are also considered inappropriate. A concise summary is appropriate if it is essential to understanding the game or its significance in the industry. See [[WP:VGSCOPE]].
# '''Video game guides.''' An article about a [[computer game]] or [[video game]] should summarize the main actions the player does to win the game. But avoid lists of gameplay weapons, items, or concepts. Detailed coverage of specific point values, achievements, time-limits, levels, types of enemies, character moves, character weight classes, and so on are also considered inappropriate. A concise summary is appropriate if it is essential to understanding the game or its significance in the industry. See [[WP:VGSCOPE]].
110 নং শাৰী: 110 নং শাৰী:
# '''Scientific journals and research papers.''' A Wikipedia article should not be presented on the assumption that the reader is well versed in the topic's field. Introductory language in the [[WP:LEAD|lead]] and initial sections of the article should be written in plain terms and concepts that can be understood by any literate reader of Wikipedia without any knowledge in the given field before advancing to more detailed explanations of the topic. While [[WP:LINK|wikilinks]] should be provided for advanced terms and concepts in that field, articles should be written on the assumption that the reader will not or cannot follow these links, instead attempting to infer their meaning from the text.
# '''Scientific journals and research papers.''' A Wikipedia article should not be presented on the assumption that the reader is well versed in the topic's field. Introductory language in the [[WP:LEAD|lead]] and initial sections of the article should be written in plain terms and concepts that can be understood by any literate reader of Wikipedia without any knowledge in the given field before advancing to more detailed explanations of the topic. While [[WP:LINK|wikilinks]] should be provided for advanced terms and concepts in that field, articles should be written on the assumption that the reader will not or cannot follow these links, instead attempting to infer their meaning from the text.
# '''Academic language.''' Texts should be written for everyday readers, not for academics. Article titles should reflect [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names)|common usage]], not academic terminology, whenever possible.
# '''Academic language.''' Texts should be written for everyday readers, not for academics. Article titles should reflect [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names)|common usage]], not academic terminology, whenever possible.
# '''Case studies.''' Many topics are based on the relationship of ''factor X'' to ''factor Y'', resulting in one or more full articles. For example, this could refer to ''situation X'' in ''location Y'', or ''version X'' of ''item Y''. This is perfectly acceptable when the two variables put together represent some culturally significant phenomenon or some otherwise notable interest. Often, separate articles are needed for a subject within a range of different countries, due to substantial differences across international borders; articles such as "[[Slate industry in Wales]]" and "[[Island Fox]]" are fitting examples. Writing about "'''Oak trees in North Carolina'''" or a "'''Blue truck'''", however, would likely constitute a [[WP:POVFORK|POV fork]] or [[WP:OR|original research]], and would certainly not result in an encyclopedic article.
# '''Case studies.''' Many topics are based on the relationship of ''factor X'' to ''factor Y'', resulting in one or more full articles. For example, this could refer to ''situation X'' in ''location Y'', or ''version X'' of ''item Y''. This is perfectly acceptable when the two variables put together represent some culturally significant phenomenon or some otherwise notable interest. Often, separate articles are needed for a subject within a range of different countries, due to substantial differences across international borders; articles such as "[[Slate industry in Wales]]" and "[[Island Fox]]" are fitting examples. Writing about "'''Oak trees in North Carolina'''" or a "'''Blue truck'''", however, would likely constitute a [[WP:POVFORK|POV fork]] or [[WP:OR|মৌলিক গৱেষণা]], and would certainly not result in an encyclopedic article.


==={{anchor|CBALL|CRYSTAL|CRYSTALBALL}}ৱিকিপিডিয়া ভৱিষ্যতবাণী কৰা জাদুৰ বল নহয়===
==={{anchor|CBALL|CRYSTAL|CRYSTALBALL}}ৱিকিপিডিয়া ভৱিষ্যতবাণী কৰা জাদুৰ বল নহয়===
{{policy shortcut|WP:BALL|WP:CBALL|WP:CRYSTAL|WP:FUTURE|WP:NOTCRYSTAL|WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL|WP:SPECULATION}}
{{policy shortcut|WP:BALL|WP:CBALL|WP:CRYSTAL|WP:FUTURE|WP:NOTCRYSTAL|WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL|WP:SPECULATION}}


Wikipedia is not a collection of [[wikipedia:Verifiability|unverifiable]] speculation. All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred. It ''is'' appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur, if discussion is properly referenced. It is ''not'' appropriate for editors to insert [[WP:NOR|their own opinions or analyses]]. Predictions, speculation, forecasts and theories stated by reliable, expert sources or recognized entities in a field may be included, though editors should be aware of creating [[WP:UNDUE|undue bias]] to any specific point-of-view. In forward-looking articles about unreleased products, such as films and games, take special care to avoid [[Wikipedia:Spam|advertising]] and unverified claims (for films, see [[WP:NFF]]). In particular:
Wikipedia is not a collection of [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:বিশ্বাসযোগ্যতা|অপ্ৰমাণিত]] speculation. All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred. It ''is'' appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur, if discussion is properly referenced. It is ''not'' appropriate for editors to insert [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:মৌলিক গৱেষণাৰহিত লেখা|নিজা মতামত আৰু বিশ্লেষণ]]. Predictions, speculation, forecasts and theories stated by reliable, expert sources or recognized entities in a field may be included, though editors should be aware of creating [[WP:UNDUE|undue bias]] to any specific point-of-view. In forward-looking articles about unreleased products, such as films and games, take special care to avoid [[Wikipedia:Spam|advertising]] and unverified claims (for films, see [[WP:NFF]]). In particular:


# Individual '''scheduled or expected future events''' should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place. Dates are '''not definite''' until the event actually takes place. If preparation for the event is not already in progress, speculation about it must be well documented. Examples of appropriate topics include the [[United States presidential election, 2012|2012 U.S. presidential election]] and [[2020 Summer Olympics]]. By comparison, the [[United States presidential election, 2020|2020 U.S. presidential election]] and [[2036 Summer Olympics]] are not appropriate article topics if nothing can be said about them that is verifiable and not original research. Avoid predicted sports team line-ups, which are inherently unverifiable and speculative. A schedule of future events may be appropriate if it can be verified. As an exception, even highly speculative articles about events that may or may not occur far in the future might be appropriate, where coverage in reliable sources is sufficient. For example, [[ultimate fate of the universe]] is an acceptable topic.
# Individual '''scheduled or expected future events''' should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place. Dates are '''not definite''' until the event actually takes place. If preparation for the event is not already in progress, speculation about it must be well documented. Examples of appropriate topics include the [[United States presidential election, 2012|2012 U.S. presidential election]] and [[2020 Summer Olympics]]. By comparison, the [[United States presidential election, 2020|2020 U.S. presidential election]] and [[2036 Summer Olympics]] are not appropriate article topics if nothing can be said about them that is verifiable and not original research. Avoid predicted sports team line-ups, which are inherently unverifiable and speculative. A schedule of future events may be appropriate if it can be verified. As an exception, even highly speculative articles about events that may or may not occur far in the future might be appropriate, where coverage in reliable sources is sufficient. For example, [[ultimate fate of the universe]] is an acceptable topic.
129 নং শাৰী: 129 নং শাৰী:


# '''Journalism.'''{{anchor|JOURNALISM}} Wikipedia should not offer first-hand news reports on breaking stories. Wikipedia is not a [[WP:PRIMARY|primary source]]. However, our sister projects [[Wikisource]] and [[Wikinews]] do exactly that, and ''are'' intended to be primary sources. Wikipedia does have many ''encyclopedia articles'' on topics of historical significance that are currently in the news, and can be updated with recently [[WP:V|verified]] information.
# '''Journalism.'''{{anchor|JOURNALISM}} Wikipedia should not offer first-hand news reports on breaking stories. Wikipedia is not a [[WP:PRIMARY|primary source]]. However, our sister projects [[Wikisource]] and [[Wikinews]] do exactly that, and ''are'' intended to be primary sources. Wikipedia does have many ''encyclopedia articles'' on topics of historical significance that are currently in the news, and can be updated with recently [[WP:V|verified]] information.
# '''News reports.'''{{anchor|NEWS}} Wikipedia considers the enduring [[Wikipedia:Notability|notability]] of persons and events. While news coverage can be useful source material for encyclopedic topics, most newsworthy events do not qualify for inclusion. For example, routine news reporting on things like announcements, sports, or celebrities is not a sufficient basis for inclusion in the encyclopedia. While including information on recent developments is sometimes appropriate, breaking news should not be emphasized or otherwise treated differently from other information. Timely news subjects not suitable for Wikipedia may be suitable for our sister project [[n:Main page|Wikinews]]. See also: [[Wikipedia:Notability (events)]]
# '''News reports.'''{{anchor|NEWS}} Wikipedia considers the enduring [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:উল্লেখযোগ্যতা|উল্লেখযোগ্যতা]] of persons and events. While news coverage can be useful source material for encyclopedic topics, most newsworthy events do not qualify for inclusion. For example, routine news reporting on things like announcements, sports, or celebrities is not a sufficient basis for inclusion in the encyclopedia. While including information on recent developments is sometimes appropriate, breaking news should not be emphasized or otherwise treated differently from other information. Timely news subjects not suitable for Wikipedia may be suitable for our sister project [[n:Main page|Wikinews]]. See also: [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:উল্লেখযোগ্যতা (পৰিঘটনা)]]
# '''Who's who.''' {{anchor|NOTWHOSWHO}} Even when an event is notable, individuals involved in it may not be. Unless news coverage of an individual goes beyond the context of a single event, our coverage of that individual should be limited to the article about that event, [[WP:DUE|in proportion]] to their importance to the overall topic. (See [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons]] for more details.)
# '''Who's who.''' {{anchor|NOTWHOSWHO}} Even when an event is notable, individuals involved in it may not be. Unless news coverage of an individual goes beyond the context of a single event, our coverage of that individual should be limited to the article about that event, [[WP:DUE|in proportion]] to their importance to the overall topic. (See [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons]] for more details.)


136 নং শাৰী: 136 নং শাৰী:
{{seealso|Wikipedia:Notability}}
{{seealso|Wikipedia:Notability}}


As explained in the policy introduction, merely being true, or even [[WP:V|verifiable]], does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Wikipedia articles should not be:
As explained in the policy introduction, merely being true, or even [[WP:V|বিশ্বাসযোগ্য]], does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Wikipedia articles should not be:


# '''Summary-only description of works.''' Wikipedia treats fiction in an encyclopedic manner, discussing the reception and significance of notable works in addition to a concise summary. For more information regarding plot summaries, see [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction)#Plot summaries]]. Similarly, articles on works of non-fiction, including documentaries, research books and papers, religious texts, and the like, should contain more than a recap or summary of the works' contents.
# '''Summary-only description of works.''' Wikipedia treats fiction in an encyclopedic manner, discussing the reception and significance of notable works in addition to a concise summary. For more information regarding plot summaries, see [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:ৰচনাশৈলীৰ হাতপুথি (writing about fiction)#Plot summaries]]. Similarly, articles on works of non-fiction, including documentaries, research books and papers, religious texts, and the like, should contain more than a recap or summary of the works' contents.
# '''Lyrics databases.''' Most song lyrics published after 1922 are protected by copyright, and any quotation of them must be kept to a minimum, and used for the purpose of direct commentary or to illustrate some aspect of the style. For songs in the public domain the article should not consist solely of the lyrics ([[Wikisource]] should be used for such articles instead), but should instead provide information about authorship, date of publication, social impact, and so on. Quotations from an out-of-copyright song should be kept to a reasonable length relative to the rest of the article, and used to facilitate discussion, or to illustrate the style; the full text can be put on [[Wikisource]] and linked to from the article. ''Never link to the lyrics of copyrighted songs unless the site linked to clearly has the right to distribute the work.'' See [[Wikipedia:Do not include the full text of lengthy primary sources]] for full discussion.
# '''Lyrics databases.''' Most song lyrics published after 1922 are protected by copyright, and any quotation of them must be kept to a minimum, and used for the purpose of direct commentary or to illustrate some aspect of the style. For songs in the public domain the article should not consist solely of the lyrics ([[Wikisource]] should be used for such articles instead), but should instead provide information about authorship, date of publication, social impact, and so on. Quotations from an out-of-copyright song should be kept to a reasonable length relative to the rest of the article, and used to facilitate discussion, or to illustrate the style; the full text can be put on [[Wikisource]] and linked to from the article. ''Never link to the lyrics of copyrighted songs unless the site linked to clearly has the right to distribute the work.'' See [[Wikipedia:Do not include the full text of lengthy primary sources]] for full discussion.
# '''Excessive listing of statistics.''' Long and sprawling lists of statistics may be confusing to readers and reduce the readability and neatness of our articles. In addition, articles should contain sufficient explanatory text to put statistics within the article in their proper context for a general reader. In cases where this may be necessary, (e.g. [[Nationwide opinion polling for the United States presidential election, 2008]]), consider using tables to enhance the readability of lengthy data lists.
# '''Excessive listing of statistics.''' Long and sprawling lists of statistics may be confusing to readers and reduce the readability and neatness of our articles. In addition, articles should contain sufficient explanatory text to put statistics within the article in their proper context for a general reader. In cases where this may be necessary, (e.g. [[Nationwide opinion polling for the United States presidential election, 2008]]), consider using tables to enhance the readability of lengthy data lists.
149 নং শাৰী: 149 নং শাৰী:


Since anyone can edit an article and most changes made are displayed immediately, inappropriate material may appear before it can be removed.
Since anyone can edit an article and most changes made are displayed immediately, inappropriate material may appear before it can be removed.
Content which is obviously inappropriate (such as an irrelevant link to a [[shock site]], or clear [[wp:vandalism|vandalism]]) is usually removed quickly. Content that is judged to violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|biographies of living persons]] policy, or that violates other [[Wikipedia:policies and guidelines|Wikipedia policies]] (especially [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]]) or the laws of the [[U.S. state]] of [[Florida]] where Wikipedia's main [[server (computing)|servers]] are hosted, will also be removed.
Content which is obviously inappropriate (such as an irrelevant link to a [[shock site]], or clear [[wp:vandalism|vandalism]]) is usually removed quickly. Content that is judged to violate Wikipedia's [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:জীৱিত ব্যক্তিৰ জীৱনী|জীৱিত ব্যক্তিৰ জীৱনী]] policy, or that violates other [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:নীতি আৰু পথনিৰ্দেশিকাসমূহ|ৱিকিপিডিয়া নীতিসমূহ]] (especially [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:নিৰপেক্ষ দৃষ্টিভংগী|নিৰপেক্ষ দৃষ্টিভংগী]]) or the laws of the [[U.S. state]] of [[Florida]] where Wikipedia's main [[server (computing)|servers]] are hosted, will also be removed.


However, some articles may include text, images, or links which some people may find objectionable, when these materials are relevant to the content. Discussion of potentially objectionable content should not focus on its offensiveness but on whether it is appropriate to include in a given article. Beyond that, "being objectionable" is generally not sufficient grounds for removal of content.
However, some articles may include text, images, or links which some people may find objectionable, when these materials are relevant to the content. Discussion of potentially objectionable content should not focus on its offensiveness but on whether it is appropriate to include in a given article. Beyond that, "being objectionable" is generally not sufficient grounds for removal of content.
155 নং শাৰী: 155 নং শাৰী:
Nor will Wikipedia remove content because the internal bylaws of some organizations forbid that information to be displayed online. Any rules that forbid members of a given organization, fraternity, or religion to show a name or image do not apply to Wikipedia because Wikipedia is not a member of those organizations.
Nor will Wikipedia remove content because the internal bylaws of some organizations forbid that information to be displayed online. Any rules that forbid members of a given organization, fraternity, or religion to show a name or image do not apply to Wikipedia because Wikipedia is not a member of those organizations.


=={{anchor|COMM|COMMUNITY}}ৱিকিপিডিয়া সমাজ==
=={{anchor|COMM|COMMUNITY}}ৱিকিপিডিয়া সম্প্ৰদায়==
The above policies are about Wikipedia's content. The following policies apply to Wikipedia's governance and processes.
The above policies are about Wikipedia's content. The following policies apply to Wikipedia's governance and processes.


166 নং শাৰী: 166 নং শাৰী:
{{policy shortcut|WP:DEMOCRACY|WP:NOT#DEM|WP:NOTDEMOCRACY}}
{{policy shortcut|WP:DEMOCRACY|WP:NOT#DEM|WP:NOTDEMOCRACY}}
{{seealso|Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion}}
{{seealso|Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion}}
Wikipedia is <span class="plainlinks">[http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2005-January/018735.html not an experiment in democracy]</span> or any other [[political system]]. Its primary but not exclusive method of determining [[wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] is through [[WP:EP|editing]] and [[Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion|discussion]], ''not'' [[m:don't vote on everything|voting]]. Although editors occasionally use [[Wikipedia:Straw polls|straw polls]] in an attempt to test for consensus, polls or surveys sometimes impede rather than assist discussion.
Wikipedia is <span class="plainlinks">[http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2005-January/018735.html not an experiment in democracy]</span> or any other [[political system]]. Its primary but not exclusive method of determining [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:ঐকমত্য|ঐকমত্য]] is through [[WP:EP|editing]] and [[Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion|discussion]], ''not'' [[m:don't vote on everything|voting]]. Although editors occasionally use [[Wikipedia:Straw polls|straw polls]] in an attempt to test for consensus, polls or surveys sometimes impede rather than assist discussion.


Straw votes should be used with caution, and are no more [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Consensus can change|binding]] than any other consensus decision. Elections and votes are only endorsed for things that take place outside Wikipedia proper, such as when electing the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]].
Straw votes should be used with caution, and are no more [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:ঐকমত্য#Consensus can change|binding]] than any other consensus decision. Elections and votes are only endorsed for things that take place outside Wikipedia proper, such as when electing the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]].


==={{anchor|BUREAUCRACY}}ৱিকিপিডিয়া কোনো আমোলাতন্ত্ৰ নহয়===
==={{anchor|BUREAUCRACY}}ৱিকিপিডিয়া কোনো আমোলাতন্ত্ৰ নহয়===
176 নং শাৰী: 176 নং শাৰী:
While Wikipedia has many elements of a [[bureaucracy]],<ref name="Jr.Lessig2010">{{cite book|author1=Joseph Michael Reagle, Jr.|author2=Lawrence Lessig|title=Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=ml7SlTq8XvIC&pg=PA90|accessdate=30 June 2011|date=30 September 2010|publisher=MIT Press|isbn=9780262014472|pages=90-91}}</ref> it is not governed by statute: it is not a [[moot court]], and rules are not the purpose of the community. Written rules do not themselves set accepted practice. Rather, they document already existing community consensus regarding what should be accepted and what should be rejected. When [[Wikipedia:Avoid instruction creep|instruction creep]] is found to have occurred, it should be removed.
While Wikipedia has many elements of a [[bureaucracy]],<ref name="Jr.Lessig2010">{{cite book|author1=Joseph Michael Reagle, Jr.|author2=Lawrence Lessig|title=Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=ml7SlTq8XvIC&pg=PA90|accessdate=30 June 2011|date=30 September 2010|publisher=MIT Press|isbn=9780262014472|pages=90-91}}</ref> it is not governed by statute: it is not a [[moot court]], and rules are not the purpose of the community. Written rules do not themselves set accepted practice. Rather, they document already existing community consensus regarding what should be accepted and what should be rejected. When [[Wikipedia:Avoid instruction creep|instruction creep]] is found to have occurred, it should be removed.


While Wikipedia's written [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|policies and guidelines]] should be taken seriously, they can be misused. Do not follow an overly strict interpretation of the ''letter'' of policy without consideration for the ''principles'' of policies. If the rules truly prevent you from improving the encyclopedia, [[Wikipedia:Ignore all rules|ignore them]]. Disagreements are resolved through [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus-based]] discussion, rather than through tightly sticking to rules and procedures. Furthermore, policies and guidelines themselves [[WP:PGLIFE|may be changed]] to reflect [[WP:CCC|evolving consensus]].
While Wikipedia's written [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:নীতি আৰু পথনিৰ্দেশিকাসমূহ|নীতি আৰু পথনিৰ্দেশিকাসমূহ]] should be taken seriously, they can be misused. Do not follow an overly strict interpretation of the ''letter'' of policy without consideration for the ''principles'' of policies. If the rules truly prevent you from improving the encyclopedia, [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:সকলো বিধি উপেক্ষা কৰক|সেইবোৰ উপেক্ষা কৰক]]. Disagreements are resolved through [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:ঐকমত্য|ঐকমত্য-ভিত্তিক]] discussion, rather than through tightly sticking to rules and procedures. Furthermore, policies and guidelines themselves [[WP:PGLIFE|may be changed]] to reflect [[WP:CCC|evolving consensus]].


A procedural error made in a proposal or request is not grounds for rejecting that proposal or request.
A procedural error made in a proposal or request is not grounds for rejecting that proposal or request.
186 নং শাৰী: 186 নং শাৰী:
Wikipedia is not a place to hold grudges, import personal conflicts, carry on ideological battles, or nurture prejudice, hatred, or fear. Making personal battles out of Wikipedia discussions goes directly against our policies and goals. In addition to avoiding battles in discussions, [[Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point|do not make changes to content or policies just to prove a point]] to someone with whom you disagree.
Wikipedia is not a place to hold grudges, import personal conflicts, carry on ideological battles, or nurture prejudice, hatred, or fear. Making personal battles out of Wikipedia discussions goes directly against our policies and goals. In addition to avoiding battles in discussions, [[Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point|do not make changes to content or policies just to prove a point]] to someone with whom you disagree.


Every user is expected to interact with others [[Wikipedia:Civility|civilly]], calmly, and in a spirit of cooperation. Do not [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|insult]], harass, or intimidate those with whom you have a disagreement. Rather, approach the matter intelligently and engage in polite discussion. If another user behaves in an uncivil, uncooperative, or insulting manner, or even tries to harass or intimidate you, this does not give you an excuse to respond in kind. Address only the factual points brought forward, ignoring the inappropriate comments, or disregard that user entirely. If necessary, point out gently that you think the comments might be considered uncivil, and make it clear that you want to move on and focus on the content issue. If a conflict continues to bother you, take advantage of Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] process. There are always users willing to [[WP:RFM|mediate]] and [[WP:RFAr|arbitrate]] disputes between others.
Every user is expected to interact with others [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:শিষ্টাচাৰ|শিষ্টাচাৰ]], calmly, and in a spirit of cooperation. Do not [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:ব্যক্তিগত আক্ৰমণ নকৰিব|insult]], harass, or intimidate those with whom you have a disagreement. Rather, approach the matter intelligently and engage in polite discussion. If another user behaves in an uncivil, uncooperative, or insulting manner, or even tries to harass or intimidate you, this does not give you an excuse to respond in kind. Address only the factual points brought forward, ignoring the inappropriate comments, or disregard that user entirely. If necessary, point out gently that you think the comments might be considered uncivil, and make it clear that you want to move on and focus on the content issue. If a conflict continues to bother you, take advantage of Wikipedia's [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:মতবিৰোধ সমাধান|মতবিৰোধ সমাধান]] process. There are always users willing to [[WP:RFM|mediate]] and [[WP:RFAr|arbitrate]] disputes between others.


In [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|large disputes]], resist the urge to turn Wikipedia into a battleground between factions. [[WP:AGF|Assume good faith]] that every editor and group is here to improve Wikipedia—especially if they hold a point of view with which you disagree. Work with whomever you like, but do not [[WP:CANVASSING|organize a faction]] with the main goal of disrupting Wikipedia’s fundamental decision-making process, which is based on building a [[WP:CONSENSUS|consensus]]. Editors in large disputes should work in good faith to find broad principles of agreement between different viewpoints.
In [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:মতবিৰোধ সমাধান|large disputes]], resist the urge to turn Wikipedia into a battleground between factions. [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:ভাল ভাৱ ৰাখক|ভাল ভাৱ ৰাখক]] that every editor and group is here to improve Wikipedia—especially if they hold a point of view with which you disagree. Work with whomever you like, but do not [[WP:CANVASSING|organize a faction]] with the main goal of disrupting Wikipedia’s fundamental decision-making process, which is based on building a [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:ঐকমত্য|ঐকমত্য]]. Editors in large disputes should work in good faith to find broad principles of agreement between different viewpoints.


Do not use Wikipedia to make [[Wikipedia:No legal threats|legal]] or other threats against Wikipedia, Wikipedians, or the Wikimedia Foundation—other means already exist to communicate legal problems.<ref>If you believe that your legal rights are being violated, you may discuss this with other users involved, take the matter to the appropriate [[meta:Mailing list|mailing list]], contact the [http://wikimediafoundation.org Wikimedia Foundation], or in cases of [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright]] violations notify us at [[Wikipedia:Contact us/Article problem/Copyright]].
Do not use Wikipedia to make [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:আইনী ভাবুকি এৰাই চলক|আইনী]] or other threats against Wikipedia, Wikipedians, or the Wikimedia Foundation—other means already exist to communicate legal problems.<ref>If you believe that your legal rights are being violated, you may discuss this with other users involved, take the matter to the appropriate [[meta:Mailing list|mailing list]], contact the [http://wikimediafoundation.org Wikimedia Foundation], or in cases of [[ৱিকিপিডিয়া:স্বত্বাধিকাৰ|স্বত্বাধিকাৰ]] violations notify us at [[Wikipedia:Contact us/Article problem/Copyright]].
</ref> Threats are not tolerated and may result in a [[Wikipedia:Banning policy|ban]].
</ref> Threats are not tolerated and may result in a [[Wikipedia:Banning policy|ban]].


09:48, 25 August 2011ৰ সংস্কৰণ

(বিষয়টোৰ গুৰুত্বৰ প্ৰতি লক্ষ্য ৰাখি এই পৃষ্ঠাটো অনুবাদৰ বাবে ৰখা হৈছে৷ লাহে লাহে কামটো কৰা হ'ব, আন সদস্যসকলৰ সময় থাকিলে মাজে মাজে কৰিব পাৰে)

ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ পাঁচটা স্তম্ভ
মূল বিষয়বস্তু নীতিসমূহ
নিৰপেক্ষ দৃষ্টিভংগী
মৌলিক গৱেষণাৰহিত লেখা
সত্যাপণযোগ্যতা
আন বিষয়বস্তু নীতিসমূহ
প্ৰবন্ধৰ শিৰোনাম
জীৱিত ব্যক্তিৰ জীৱনী
ৱিকিপিডিয়া কি নহয়
এই পৃষ্ঠাত অসমীয়া ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ কেতবোৰ নীতি সন্নিৱিষ্ট কৰা হৈছে। সকলো সম্পাদকে এইবোৰ সাধাৰণতে মানি চলা উচিত। ইয়াত কৰা সালসলনিত ঐকমত্য প্ৰতিফলন হোৱা উচিত।
চমুপথবোৰ:
WP:NOT
WP:!


ৱিকিপিডিয়া এখন অনলাইন বিশ্বকোষ৷ ইয়াত অনলাইন ব্যৱহাৰকৰ্তাসকলৰ মাজত পাৰস্পৰিক সম্পৰ্ক ধৰি ৰাখি এখন উচ্চ মানদণ্ডৰ বিশ্বকোষ নিৰ্মান কৰাৰ কাৰণে চেষ্টা কৰা হৈছে৷ গতিকে ৱিকিপিডিয়া আচলতে কি, ইয়াত কেনে ধৰণৰ সমল অন্তৰ্ভুক্ত কৰা হয় বা কেনে পদ্ধতিৰ মাজেৰে ইয়াত কাম কৰা হয় এই সকলো কথা জানিবলৈ ৱিকিপিডিয়া নহয় কি পৃষ্ঠাটো এবাৰ পঢ়াটো অতি গুৰুত্বপূৰ্ণ৷


শৈলী আৰু সজ্জা

ৱিকিপিডিয়া কোনো কাগজেৰে নিৰ্মিত বিশ্বকোষ নহয়

নীতিৰ সংক্ষিপ্ত:
WP:NOTPAPER
WP:PAPER

ৱিকিপিডিয়া কোনো কাগজেৰে নিৰ্মিত বিশ্বকোষ নহয়, ই হৈছে ডিজিটেল পদ্ধতিৰে নিৰ্মাণ কৰা বিশ্বকোষৰ এটা প্ৰকল্প৷ ইয়াৰ পৃষ্ঠাত প্ৰকাশ কৰা তথ্য আৰু প্ৰকাশযোগ্য প্ৰবন্ধৰ কোনো সীমা নাই৷ ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ পাতত বিশ্বকোষ এখনৰ মাজত থাকিব পৰা সকলো ধৰণৰ প্ৰবন্ধ লিখিব পাৰে৷ ইয়াত লিখিব বিচৰা প্ৰবন্ধসমূহ ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ পাঁচটা স্তম্ভ নীতিৰ আধাৰত পৰিচালিত হ'ব৷

এটা প্ৰৱন্ধৰ যুক্তিসংগত আকাৰ থকাটো ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ অধিগম্যতাৰ বাবে প্ৰয়োজনীয়; বিশেষকৈ ডায়েল আপ আৰু ম’বাইল ব্ৰাউজাৰ ব্যৱহাৰ কৰা পাঠকসকলে দীঘলীয়া প্ৰৱন্ধ হ’লে পৃষ্ঠা ডাউনল’ডত অসুবিধা পাব পাৰে (চাওক ৱিকিপিডিয়া:প্ৰৱন্ধৰ আকাৰ) । দীঘল প্ৰৱন্ধ সৰু সৰু অংশত ভাগ কৰা আৰু যথাস্থানত সাৰাংশ লিখাটো কোনো বিষয়ৰ বিকাশৰ সাধাৰণ শৈলী (চাওক ৱিকিপিডিয়া:সাৰাংশ শৈলী) । ছপা বিশ্বকোষে কিছুমান বিষয় স্থবিৰকৈ চমুৱাইহে লিখিব পাৰে, কিন্তু আমি অধিক তথ্য অন্তৰ্ভুক্ত কৰিব পাৰোঁ, অধিক বৰ্হিসংযোগ দিব পাৰোঁ, আৰু সোনকালে নৱীকৰণ কৰিব পাৰোঁ । ৱিকিপিডিয়া আৰু কাগজৰ প্ৰকাশৰ ভিন্নতাৰ বিষয়ে অধিক জানিবলৈ ৱিকিপিডিয়া:ৰচনাশৈলীৰ হাতপুথি চাওক ।

সমল

কেৱল শুদ্ধ আৰু কামত অহা গুণতে বিশ্বকোষ এখনত যিকোনো তথ্য সন্নিৱিষ্ট কৰিব নোৱাৰি । কেইটামান শ্ৰেণীৰ অন্তৰ্ভুক্তিৰ ওপৰত মাজে-সময়ে প্ৰশ্ন উঠিলেও ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ বিষয়ববীয়াসকল এই কথাত ঐকমত্য যে তলৰ অনুচ্ছেদসমূহ "ৱিকিপিডিয়া কি নহয়" বা "ৱিকিপিডিয়াত কি কৰিব নোৱাৰে" তাৰ ভাল উদাহৰণ । উদাহৰণকেইটা বিশদ বিৱৰণ নহ’বও পাৰে ।

ৱিকিপিডিয়া এখন অভিধান নহয়

নীতিৰ সংক্ষিপ্ত:
WP:NOT#DICDEF
WP:NOT#DICT
WP:NOT#DICTIONARY
প্ৰধান পৃষ্ঠা: ৱিকিপিডিয়া:ৱিকিপিডিয়া এখন অভিধান নহয়

ৱিকিপিডিয়া কোনো অভিধান নহয়, কাৰিকৰী কথা বা অৰ্থহীন শব্দৰ ব্যৱহাৰিক সহায়িকা নহয় । ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ প্ৰৱন্ধ তলৰ উদাহৰণবোৰো নহয়:

  1. সংজ্ঞা । যদিও প্ৰৱন্ধসমূহ এটা ভাল সংজ্ঞাৰে আৰু এটা বিষয়ৰ বিৱৰণৰে আৰম্ভ হ’ব লাগে, সেইবোৰে বিশেষ বিষয়টোৰ ওপৰত আন আন তথ্যও আগবঢ়োৱা উচিত । সম্ভৱপৰ হ’লে কেৱল সংজ্ঞাহে থকা প্ৰৱন্ধবোৰত আন বিষয়বস্তু সন্নিৱিষ্ট কৰি বিস্তাৰ কৰা উচিত ।
  2. অভিধান অন্তৰ্ভুক্তি । বিশ্বকোষৰ প্ৰৱন্ধৰ বিষয় হৈছে কোনো ব্যক্তি, গোট, ধাৰণা, ঠাই, বস্তু, এটা ঘটনা আদি । কোনো ক্ষেত্ৰত এটা শব্দ বা বাক্যাংশই বিশ্বকোষৰ বিষয় হ’ব পাৰে, যেনে মেচিডনিয়া(পৰিভাষা) । কাচিত্হে কোনো প্ৰৱন্ধৰ এটাতকৈ অধিক সুস্পষ্ট সংজ্ঞা বা শিৰোনামাৰ ব্যৱহাৰ থাকিব পাৰে । সংখ্যাৰৰ সাংস্কৃতিক বা গাণিতিক বিশেষত্বৰ বিষয়ে লিখা প্ৰৱন্ধও গ্ৰহণযোগ্য ।
    অভিধানিক ৱিকি বিচাৰিছে যদি আমাৰ ভগ্নী প্ৰকল্প Wiktionary চাওক ।
  3. ব্যৱহাৰ, অপশব্দ, আৰু/বা জতুৱা ঠাঁচ পথনিৰ্দেশিকা । ভাষা, দোৱান বা অপশব্দৰ প্ৰকাৰৰ বৰ্ণনামূলক প্ৰৱন্ধ গ্ৰহণীয় । তেনে ভাষাৰ কথকৰ বাবে সহায় প্ৰৱন্ধ গ্ৰহণযোগ্য নহয় । অধিক তথ্যৰ বাবে তলৰ "ৱিকিপিডিয়া কোনো হাতপুথি, প্ৰসংগপুথি, পাঠ্যপুথি বা বৈজ্ঞানিক গৱেষণাপত্ৰ নহয়" চাওক ।
    সহায়িকাপুথিৰ সংগ্ৰহ বিচাৰিছে যদি আমাৰ ভগ্নী প্ৰকল্প Wikibooks চাওক ।

ৱিকিপিডিয়া কোনো মৌলিক চিন্তাৰ প্ৰকাশস্থল নহয়

নীতিৰ সংক্ষিপ্ত:
WP:FORUM
WP:NOT#CHAT
WP:NOTESSAY
WP:NOT#ESSAY
WP:NOT#FANSITE
WP:NOT#FORUM
WP:NOT#OR
"WP:FORUM" redirects here; you may be looking for Wikipedia:Forum shopping or Wikipedia:Village pump.

ৱিকিপিডিয়া আপোনাৰ নিজৰ চিন্তা আৰু বিশ্লেষণ বা নতুন তথ্য প্ৰকাশৰ স্থল নহয় । মৌলিক গৱেষণাৰ নীতি মানি চলি অনুগ্ৰহ কৰি তলৰ কাৰণসমূহৰ বাবে ৱিকিপিডিয়াক ব্যৱহাৰ নকৰিব:

  1. প্ৰাথমিক (মৌলিক) গৱেষণা, যেনে প্ৰস্তাৱিত তত্ত্ব আৰু সমাধান, মৌলিক চিন্তা, শব্দৰ সংজ্ঞা, নতুন শব্দৰ উদ্ভাৱন আদি । আপুনি যদি কোনো বিষয়ত প্ৰাথমিক গৱেষণা সম্পূৰ্ণ কৰিছে, তেন্তে তাৰ ফলাফল আন ঠাইত যেনে সহকৰ্মীয়ে পৰ্যালোচনা কৰা পত্ৰিকা, আন ছপা মাধ্যম বা সন্মানীয় অনলাইন পত্ৰিকাত প্ৰকাশ কৰক । তাৰ পিছত ই গ্ৰহণীয় জ্ঞানৰ অংশ হৈ পৰিলে ৱিকিপিডিয়াই ইয়াক বিবেচনা কৰিব; কিন্তু বিষয়বস্তুৰবিশ্বাসযোগ্যতা প্ৰমাণ কৰাৰ বাবে আৰু সেয়া যে মাথোঁ সম্পাদকৰ মতামত নহয় তাক দেখুৱাবলৈ তেনে সঠিক উৎসৰ উল্লেখ আৱশ্যক ।
  2. ব্যক্তিগত উদ্ভাৱন. যদি আপুনি বা আপোনাৰ কোনো বন্ধুৱে এটা নতুন শব্দ, এটা সুৰাপানৰ খেল, বা এটা নতুন ধৰণৰ নৃত্যশৈলীৰ উদ্ভাৱন কৰিছে, তেন্তে একাধিক, স্বাধীন আৰু দ্বিতীয় উৎসই তাৰ প্ৰতিবেদন নিদিয়ালৈকে সেয়া ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ প্ৰৱন্ধৰ বিষয় হ’বলৈ উল্লেখযোগ্য নহয় । ৱিকিপিডিয়া এদিনতে গঢ়া বস্তুৰ বাবে নহয় ।
  3. ব্যক্তিগত ৰচনা য’ত বিশেষজ্ঞৰ মতামতৰ সলনি আপোনাৰ নিজা অনুভৱ প্ৰকাশ পায় । যদিও ৱিকিপিডিয়াত মানুহৰ জ্ঞান সংগ্ৰহ কৰা হৈছে, ই তেনে জ্ঞানৰ অংশ হ’বলৈ যোৱা ব্যক্তিগত মতৰ বাহন নহয় । কোনো ক্ষেত্ৰত এজন ব্যক্তিৰ মতামত আলোচনা কৰাটো অতি প্ৰযোজনীয় হ’লে আন সদস্যসকলক তাৰ বিষয়ে লিখিবলৈ দিয়া উচিত । ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ লগত সংগতি থকা ব্যক্তিগত ৰচনা আপোনাৰ সদস্য নামস্থানত বা Meta-wiki|মেটা ৱিকিত গ্ৰহণীয় । Wikinfoত থকা ফৰ্কে প্ৰৱন্ধত ব্যক্তিগত মতামত দিবলৈ উত্‍সাহ যোগায় ।
  4. আলোচনা সভা । অনুগ্ৰহ কৰি এখন বিশ্বকোষ সৃষ্টিৰ কামতহে মনোযোগ দিয়ক । আপুনি ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ লগত সংগতি থকা বিষয়ৰ ওপৰত কথা-বতৰা পৃষ্ঠাত আন সদস্যৰ লগত আলোচনা কৰিব পাৰে আৰু সংশ্লিষ্ট আলোচনা পৃষ্ঠাত কোনো সমস্যাৰ সমাধান কৰিব পাৰে, কিন্তু অনুগ্ৰহ কৰি প্ৰৱন্ধত সেই আলোচনা অন্তৰ্ভুক্ত নকৰিব । মনত ৰাখিব যে আলোচনা পৃষ্ঠাৰ উদ্দেশ্য হৈছে কোনো প্ৰৱন্ধৰ উন্নতি ঘটোৱা । সেইখন প্ৰৱন্ধটোৰ বিষয়বস্তুৰ ওপৰত সাধাৰণ আলোচনা কৰাৰ বাবে নহয়, বা উপদেশ আৰু কাৰিকৰী সহায়ৰ বাবেও নহয় । আপুনি যদি কোনো বিষয়ৰ ওপৰত নিৰ্দিষ্ট প্ৰশ্ন সুধিব বিচাৰিছে তেন্তে প্ৰসংগ মেজত সেইটো উত্থাপন কৰক । আন ৱিকিপিডিয়ানৰ লগত পাতলীয়া ধৰণৰ আলোচনা কৰিব বিচাৰিলে [আই.আৰ.চি. চেনেল] যেনে #wikipedia ব্যৱহাৰ কৰক । মন কৰক যে ই এটা আই.আৰ.চি. চেনেলহে, কোনো বাৰ্তা দেৱাল নহয় । আলোচনা আৰু তৰ্কৰ বাবে ব্যৱহাৰ কৰিব পৰাকৈ আন কেইবাটাও ৱিকিপ্ৰকল্পৰ কাম চলি আছে । আলোচনা পৃষ্ঠাত অগ্ৰহণযোগ্য বিষয়বস্তু আলোচনা পৃষ্ঠা পথনিৰ্দেশিকা অনুসৰি আঁতৰাই পেলোৱা হ’ব পাৰে ।

ৱিকিপিডিয়া কোনো প্ৰচাৰযন্ত্ৰ নহয়

নীতিৰ সংক্ষিপ্ত:
WP:NOTADVERTISING
WP:NOTADVOCATE
WP:NOTGOSSIP
WP:NOTOPINION
WP:NOTSCANDAL
WP:NOTSOAPBOX
WP:NOTPROMOTION
WP:PROMOTION
WP:SOAP
WP:SOAPBOX

ৱিকিপিডিয়া কোনো প্ৰচাৰযন্ত্ৰ, যুদ্ধক্ষেত্ৰ, বা অপপ্ৰচাৰ, বিজ্ঞাপন আৰু প্ৰদৰ্শনীৰ বাহন নহয় । এই নীতিটো প্ৰৱন্ধ, শ্ৰেণী, সাঁচ, আলোচনা আৰু সদস্য পৃষ্ঠাৰ ক্ষেত্ৰত প্ৰযোজ্য । সেইকাৰনে তলৰ বিষয়বোৰ ৱিকিপিডিয়াত সন্নিৱিষ্ট কৰা উচিত নহয় ।

  1. কোনোধৰণৰ ওকালতি, অপপ্ৰচাৰ বা নিযুক্তি: বাণিজ্যিক, ৰাজনৈতিক, ধাৰ্মিক, ক্ৰীড়া-সম্পৰ্কীয় বা তেনে আন কিবা । ৱিকিপিডিয়াত অৱশ্যেই নিৰপেক্ষ দৃষ্টিভংগীৰ নীতি মানি চলি তেনেধৰণৰ কামৰ বিষয়ে বস্তুনিষ্ঠভাৱে উল্লেখ কৰিব পাৰি । আপোনাৰ চিন্তা-ধাৰণাৰ সুফলসমূহ ৰাইজক জনাব বিচাৰিলে আপুনি এটা জালপঞ্জী আৰম্ভ কৰিব পাৰে বা ইণ্টাৰনেট ফ’ৰামত যোগদান কৰিব পাৰে ।[1] ৱিকিপিডিয়া:ওকালতি চাওক ।
  2. অভিমতৰ অংশ : যদিও কিছুমান বিষয় যেনে সাম্প্ৰতিক বা ৰাজনৈতিক ঘটনাৱলীৱে কোনো ব্যক্তিক প্ৰচাৰ চলাবলৈ (উদাহৰণস্বৰূপে তেওঁৰ প্ৰিয় দৃষ্টিভংগীৰে আবেগিকভাৱে ওকালতি কৰা) প্ৰলোভিত কৰিব পাৰে, ৱিকিপিডিয়া তেনে কামৰ মাধ্যম নহয় । প্ৰৱন্ধসমূহে যুক্তিপূৰ্ণ তথ্য আৰু নিৰপেক্ষ দৃষ্টিভংগী ডাঙি ধৰি ভাৰসাম্য ৰক্ষা কৰিব লাগিব । ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ লেখকসকলে সোনকালে অপ্ৰচলিত হৈ নোযোৱা প্ৰৱন্ধ লিখিবলৈ অহৰহ চেষ্ঠা কৰা উচিত । কিন্তু ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ ভগ্নী প্ৰকল্প ৱিকিবাতৰিয়ে ইয়াৰ প্ৰৱন্ধৰ ওপৰত মন্তব্যক আদৰণি জনায় ।
  3. কেলেংকাৰীৰ প্ৰচাৰ, পাতলীয়া আলোচনাৰ জৰিয়তে বা কাৰোবাৰ মুখেৰে শুনা । জীৱিত ব্যক্তিৰ বিষয়ে লিখা প্ৰৱন্ধ সেইজনৰ মানহানি নোহোৱাকৈ আৰু ব্যক্তিগত জীৱনত আঘাত নজনোৱাকৈ উচ্চ মানদণ্ডৰ হ’ব লাগে । কেৱল আন এজনৰ সন্মানক আক্ৰমণ কৰিবলৈকে প্ৰৱন্ধ লিখিব নালাগে ।
  4. আত্মপ্ৰচাৰ, আপোনাৰ নিজৰ বিষয়ে বা আপুনি জড়িত থকা প্ৰকল্পৰ বিষয়ে লিখিবলৈ মন যোৱাটো স্বাভাৱিক । কিন্তু মনত ৰাখিব যে ৱ্কিপিডিয়া প্ৰৱন্ধৰ মানদণ্ডসমূহ সেইবোৰ পৃষ্ঠাৰ বাবেও সমানে প্ৰযোজ্য । তাৰ ভিতৰত আছে নিৰপেক্ষ দৃষ্টিভংগী যিটো নিজৰ বিষয়ে লিখোঁতে বজাই ৰখাটো টান হ’ব পাৰে । আত্মজীৱনীৰ উত্‍সলৈ পোনাই দিয়া সংযোগ বা প্ৰসংগৰ পয়োভৰ গ্ৰহণযোগ্য নহয় । অধিক তথ্যৰ বাবে ৱিকিপিডিয়া:উল্লেখযোগ্যতা, ৱিকিপিডিয়া:আত্মজীৱনী আৰু ৱিকিপিডিয়া:আদৰ্শৰ বিবাদ চাওক ।
  5. বিজ্ঞাপন: প্ৰতিষ্ঠান আৰু সামগ্ৰীৰ তথ্যসমূহ বস্তুনিষ্ঠ আৰু পক্ষপাতশূন্য শৈলীৰে লিখা হয় । সকলো প্ৰৱন্ধৰ বিষয়বস্তুৰ স্বাধীন, তৃতীয় পক্ষ উৎসৰ দ্বাৰা সত্যাসত্য নিৰূপণ হোৱা উচিত । সেইবাবে কোনো সৰু গেৰেজ বা স্থানীয় কোম্পানীৰ বিষয়ে লিখা প্ৰৱন্ধ গ্ৰহণীয় নহয় । বৃহ্ত্‍ প্ৰতিষ্ঠানৰ লগত জড়িত হ’লেহে বাণিজ্যিক গোটৰ বহিঃ সংযোগ গ্ৰহণযোগ্য হ’ব । ৱিকিপিডিয়াই কোনো প্ৰতিষ্ঠানৰ অনুমোদন নকৰে বা জড়িত প্ৰকল্প নচলায় । ক’ৰ্প’ৰেট উল্লেখযোগ্যতাৰ সহায়ৰ বাবে ৱিকিপিডিয়া:উল্লেখযোগ্যতা (সন্থা আৰু প্ৰতিষ্ঠান) চাওক । বাণিজ্যিক নহ’লেও কোনো ঘটনাৰ প্ৰচাৰ বা ৰাজহুৱা জাননীৰ বাবে আন ফ’ৰাম ব্যৱহাৰ কৰক, ৱিকিপিডিয়া নহয় ।

ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ ভিতৰুৱা নীতি আৰু পথনিৰ্দেশিকাবোৰৰ ওপৰত শৃংখলাপূৰ্ণ মতামত সদস্য পৃষ্ঠাত কৰিব পাৰি, কাৰণ সেইবোৰ এই প্ৰকল্পৰ সাম্প্ৰতিক আৰু ভৱিষ্যতৰ কৰ্মৰাজীৰ বাবে প্ৰয়োজনীয় ।

ৱিকিপিডিয়া কোনো সংযোগ,চিত্ৰ বা মিডিয়া ফাইল ৰখা ভঁৰাল নহয়

নীতিৰ সংক্ষিপ্ত:
WP:LINKFARM
WP:NOTLINK
WP:NOTMIRROR
WP:NOTREPOSITORY
WP:NOTIMAGE
WP:NOTGALLERY

ৱিকিপিডিয়া মাত্ৰ সংযোগ, চিত্ৰ, বা মিডিয়া ফাইল ৰখা মিৰ’ৰ বা ভঁৰাল নহয় । ৱিকিপিডিয়া প্ৰৱন্ধ তলত দিয়া ধৰণৰ হ’ব নালাগে :

  1. মাথোঁ বহিঃ সংযোগৰ সংগ্ৰহ বা ইণ্টাৰনেট নিৰ্দেশিকা । প্ৰৱন্ধত এটা বা অধিক বিষয়বস্তু-সম্বন্ধীয় সংযোদ দিয়াত একো বাধা নাই; কিন্তু অতিমাত্ৰা তালিকাই প্ৰৱন্ধটোক গৌণ কৰি ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ উদ্দেশ্যৰ পৰা আঁতৰি যাব পাৰে । বহু "অনুৰাগী স্থান" বা "ফেনচাইট" থকা থকা বিষয়ৰ প্ৰৱন্ধত এটা মুখ্য অনুৰাগী স্থানৰ সংযোগ দিয়াই উচিত । সহায়ৰ বাবে ৱিকিপিডিয়া:বহিঃ সংযোগ চাওক ।
  2. ভিতৰুৱা সংযোগৰ সংগ্ৰহ, মাত্ৰ দ্ব্যৰ্থতা দূৰীকৰণ পৃষ্ঠাৰ বাহিৰে যেতিয়া কোনো প্ৰৱন্ধৰ শিৰোনামা দ্ব্যৰ্থক হয়, আৰু প্ৰৱন্ধ সজ্জা তথা দিক্‌দৰ্শনত সহায় হোৱাকৈ তালিকা পৃষ্ঠাৰ বাহিৰে । ইয়াৰ বাবে অনুগ্ৰহ কৰি ৱিকিপিডিয়া:মূল তালিকাসমূহ#নিৰ্বাচনৰ মাপকাঠী চাওক ।
  3. মাথোঁ ৰাজহুৱা প্ৰান্ত(পাব্লিক ডমেইন) বা আন উত্‍স তথ্য যেনে সমগ্ৰ কিতাপ বা উত্‍স সংকেত, মূল ঐতিহাসিক নথি, আইন, ঘোষণা, আৰু আন আন উত্‍স তথ্য যিবোৰ মৌলিক ৰূপতহে উপস্থাপন কৰিলে কামত আহে । প্ৰাথমিক উত্‍সৰ সম্পূৰ্ণ নকল ৱিকিউত্‍সতহে অন্তৰ্ভুক্ত কৰিব পাৰি, ৱিকিপিডিয়াত নহয় । ৰাজহুৱা প্ৰান্তৰ সম্পদ যেনে এনচাইক্ল’পেডিয়া ব্ৰিটানিকাৰ তথ্য প্ৰৱন্ধত বিষয়বস্তু যোগ কৰিবলৈ ব্যৱহাৰ কৰিব পাৰি (তেনে কাৰ্যৰ পথনিৰ্দেশিকাৰ বাবে কুম্ভীলক বৃত্তি পথনিৰ্দেশিকা:ৰাজহুৱা প্ৰান্তৰ উত্‍স চাওক) । অধিক তথ্যৰ বাবে ৱিকিপিডিয়া:দীঘলীয়া মূল উৎসৰ সম্পূৰ্ণ পাঠ সন্নিৱিষ্ট নকৰিব আৰু ৱিকিউত্‍সৰ অন্তৰ্ভুক্তিকৰণ নীতি চাওক ।
  4. মাথোঁ চিত্ৰ বা মিডিয়া ফাইলৰ সংগ্ৰহ য’ত প্ৰৱন্ধৰ নাম-গোন্ধ নাই । আপুনি মাত্ৰ ছবি দান কৰিব খুজিলে তাক বিশ্বকোষীয় লেখাৰে সজাই তোলক, বা ৱিকিপিডিয়া সাধাৰণত অন্তৰ্ভুক্ত কৰক । যদি ছবিখন কোনো ৱেবচাইটৰ ৰাজহুৱা প্ৰান্তৰ উত্‍সৰ পৰা লোৱা হৈছে, তেন্তে তাক ৱিকিপিডিয়া:প্ৰৱন্ধ নোহোৱা চিত্ৰ বা ৱিকিপিডিয়া:ৰাজহুৱা প্ৰান্ত চিত্ৰ উত্‍সত সন্নিৱিষ্ট কৰক ।

ৱিকিপিডিয়া গীতৰ কথাৰ তথ্যকোষ নহয়

ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ প্ৰৱন্ধত স্বত্বাধিকাৰ থকা গীতৰ কথা সন্নিৱিষ্ট কৰাটো অনুমোদিত নহয় । ৰাজহুৱা প্ৰান্তত থকা গীতৰ কথা অন্তৰ্ভুক্ত কৰিব পাৰি, কিন্তু তাৰ লগত গীতটোৰ লেখক, শিল্পী, শ্ৰব্যসঁফুৰাৰ নাম, বাণীবন্ধনৰ বছৰৰ লগতে ইতিহাস, আঁৰৰ কথা, বিষয়বস্তু আৰু সংগীতৰ বিশ্লেষণৰ বিষয়ে পক্ষপাতশূন্যভাৱে লিখিব লাগিব ।

ৱিকিপিডিয়া কোনো জালপঞ্জী,সামাজিক যোগাযোগমূলক বা স্মৃতিচিহ্ন ৰক্ষাৰ স্থান নহয়

নীতিৰ সংক্ষিপ্ত:
WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK
WP:NOTWEBHOST
WP:NOTBLOG
WP:NOTCLOUD
WP:NOTDATINGSERVICE
WP:NOTFACEBOOK
WP:NOTGAMEHOST
WP:NOTTWITTER
WP:NOTLINKEDIN
WP:NOTMEMORIAL
অতিৰিক্ত তথ্য: ৱিকিপিডিয়া:সদস্য পৃষ্ঠা

ৱিকিপিডিয়া টুইটাৰ বা ফে’চবুকৰ দৰে সামাজিক যোগাযোগৰ মাধ্যম নহয় । আপুনি ৱিকিপিডিয়াত নিজৰ ৱেবচাইট, ব্ল’গ, ৱিকি, বা ক্লাউড তুলি দিব নোৱাৰে । ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ পৃষ্ঠা তলত দিয়া উদাহৰণবোৰৰ দৰে হ’ব নালাগে :

  1. ব্যক্তিগত ৱেব পৃষ্ঠা । ৱিকিপিডিয়ানসকলৰ নিজৰ সদস্য পৃষ্ঠা থাকে, কিন্তু সেয়া বিশ্বকোষত কাম কৰাৰ বিষয়ে তথ্য প্ৰদানৰ বাবেহে ব্যৱহাৰ কৰা উচিত । আপুনি যদি ব্যক্তিগত ৱেবপৃষ্ঠা বা ব্ল’গ এটা সৃষ্টি কৰিব খুজিছে, তেন্তে ইণ্টাৰনেটত তেনে বিনামূলীয়া সুবিধা দিয়া অজস্ৰ চাইটৰ পৰা কোনো এটা বাচি লওক । সদস্য পৃষ্ঠাত সামাজিক নেটৱৰ্ক সেৱা বা ধেমালিৰ ওপৰত গুৰুত্ব দিয়াৰ সলনি তাক সঠিক সহযোগৰ ভেঁটি হিছাপে গঢ়ি তোলক । ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ লগত সংগতি থকা উপযুক্ত [[নামস্থানত সৃষ্টি কৰিব পাৰি ।
  2. ফাইল ভঁৰাল স্থান । অনুগ্ৰহ কৰি কেৱল ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ প্ৰৱন্ধ বা প্ৰকল্প পৃষ্ঠাত ব্যৱহাৰ হোৱা (বা ব্যৱহাৰ হ’বলগীয়া) ফাইলহে আপল’ড কৰক । আপোনাৰ হাতত যদি আন প্ৰাসংগিক ছবি আছে, সেয়া ৱিকিমিডিয়া কমন্‌ছত আপল’ড কৰক য’ৰ পৰা তাক ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ লগত সংযোগ কৰিব পৰা যাব ।
  3. ডেটিং সেৱা । সম্বন্ধ গঢ়াৰ বাবে বা যৌনতাৰ সংঘাতৰ বাবে ৱিকিপিডিয়া উপযুক্ত স্থান নহয় । অতিমাত্ৰা এনে বাহিৰা কথাক স্থান দিয়া সদস্য পৃষ্ঠা গ্ৰহণযোগ্য নহয় ।
  4. স্মৃতিচিহ্ন । বিশ্বকোষৰ প্ৰৱন্ধ‍ৰ বিষয়বস্তুৱে ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ উল্লেখযোগ্যতাৰ প্ৰয়োজনীয়তা পূৰণ কৰিব‍ই লাগিব । এই প্ৰয়োজনীয়তা পূৰণ নকৰা মৃত বন্ধু, আত্মীয়, চিনাকী মানুহ বা আন কাৰোবাৰ স্মৃতিচাৰণৰ বাবে ৱিকিপিডিয়া উপযুক্ত স্থান নহয় । মন কৰক যে এই নীতিটো মূল প্ৰৱন্ধ স্থানৰ বাহিৰত প্ৰযোজ্য নহয় আৰু প্ৰতিষ্ঠিত ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ মৃত্যু হ’লে তেওঁৰ সদস্য পৃষ্ঠাক ইয়াৰ পৰা সীমিত অব্যাহতি দিয়া হয় ।

যদি আপুনি ৱিকি প্ৰযুক্তিক আন কোনো প্ৰকল্পত সহযোগিতাৰ বাবে ব্যৱহাৰ কৰিব খোজে (লাগিলে সি মাত্ৰ এখন পৃষ্ঠাই হওক), তাৰ কাৰণে আন বহুতো ৱিকি হ’ষ্টিঙৰ সুবিধা থকা বিনামূলীয়া আৰু ব্যৱসায়িক চাইট আছে । আপুনি আপোনাৰ চাৰ্ভাৰত ৱিকি ছফ্টৱেৰ ইনষ্টলো কৰিও ল’ব পাৰে । এই বিষয়ক তথ্যৰ বাবে MediaWiki.orgত [[ইনষ্টল প্ৰক্ৰিয়াত সহায় চাওক ।

ওপৰত উল্লেখ কৰা বিষয়বস্তুৰ সীমাবদ্ধতা আপোনাৰ সদস্য পৃষ্ঠা আৰু আলোচনা পৃষ্ঠাতো প্ৰযোজ্য । আপোনাৰ সদস্য পৃষ্ঠা এটা ব্ল’গ নহয় । তাৰ উপৰি আপোনাৰ সদস্য পৃষ্ঠাখন আপোনাৰ নহয় । ই ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ অংশ, আৰু আত্মপ্ৰচাৰৰ সলনি ৱিকিপিডিয়ানৰ মাজত সহযোগিতা বঢ়োৱাৰ বাবেহে ইয়াৰ ব্যৱহাৰ হোৱা উচিত । সদস্য পৃষ্ঠাৰ বিষয়ে বৰ্তমানৰ ঐকমত্য পথনিৰ্দেশিকাৰ বাবে সদস্য পৃষ্ঠা সহায় চাওক ।

ৱিকিপিডিয়া কোনো ডিৰেক্টৰি নহয়

নীতিৰ সংক্ষিপ্ত:
WP:NOPRICES
WP:NOTCATALOG
WP:NOTCV
WP:NOTDIR
WP:NOTDIRECTORY
WP:NOTTVGUIDE
WP:NOTRADIOGUIDE
WP:NOTYELLOW
WP:NOTEVERYTHING

ৱিকিপিডিয়া সকলো অস্বিত্ব থকা বস্তুৰে ডিৰেক্টৰি বা নিৰ্দেশিকা নহয় । [2] । ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ প্ৰৱন্ধ তলত দিয়াৰ দৰে নহয় :

  1. মিল নথকা বিষয়ৰ তালিকা বা ভঁৰাল যেনে উক্তি, বা ব্যক্তি (সঁচা বা কাল্পনিক)আদি । আপুনি উক্তিসমূহ অন্তৰ্ভুক্ত কৰিব বিচাৰিলে সেয়া আমাৰ ভগ্নী প্ৰকল্প ৱিকিউক্তিত কৰক । তালিকাৰ ভুক্তি বিখ্যাত হ'লে বা বিষয়ৰ লগত সম্বন্ধ থাকিলে তালিকা দিয়াত বাধা নাই । ক্ষিপ্ৰ প্ৰসংগৰ বাবে ৱিকিপিডিয়াত প্ৰসংগ তালিকা বা সাৰণীও অন্তৰ্ভুক্ত কৰিব পাৰি ।
  2. বংশানুক্ৰমিক ভুক্তি জীৱনী প্ৰৱন্ধ কেৱল বিখ্যাত, কুখ্যাত, বা কোনো সফল ব্যক্তিৰ বিষয়েহে হোৱা উচিত | ইয়াৰ বাবে তেওঁৰ নাম বহু বাহ্যিক উত্‍সত আছে নেকি চালেই গম পোৱা যায় | কম জনাজাত ব্যক্তিৰ বিষয়ে আন প্ৰৱন্ধৰ মাজতে উল্লেখ কৰিব পাৰি | প্ৰস্তাৱিত জীৱনী অভিধান প্ৰকল্পৰ বাবে m:Wikipeople চাওক
  3. টেলিফোন ডিৰেক্টৰি বা য়েল্ল' পেজেজ । ফোন নাম্বাৰ, ফেক্স নাম্বাৰ আৰু ই-মেইল ঠিকনাৰ দৰে যোগাযোগৰ তথ্য বিশ্বকোষত থাকিব নালাগে ।
  4. ডিৰেক্টৰি, ডিৰেক্টৰি ভুক্তি, ইলেক্ট্ৰনিক প্ৰ'গ্ৰেম নিৰ্দেশিকা, বা ব্যৱসায়ৰ সমল । উদাহৰণস্বৰূপে, ৰেডিঅ' ষ্টেচনৰ ওপৰত লিখা প্ৰৱন্ধত প্ৰচাৰ হ'বলগীয়া কাৰ্যসূচী, বিজ্ঞাপন আদিৰ বিষয়ে থাকিব নালাগে, মাত্ৰ গুৰুত্বপূৰ্ণ ঘটনা বা ঐতিহাসিক কাৰ্যসূচীৰ উল্লেখ কৰিলেই হ'ল । তেনেধৰণে ব্যৱসায় সম্বন্ধীয় পৃষ্ঠাত প্ৰতিষ্ঠানটোৰ সকলো পেটেণ্টৰ তালিকা থাকিব নালাগে ।
  5. বিক্ৰী তালিকা । উত্সৰ উল্লেখ আৰু বৈধ কাৰণ নাথাকিলে সামগ্ৰীৰ দাম লিখিব নালাগে । আন সামগ্ৰীৰ লগত বা বিভিন্ন বিক্ৰেতাৰ মাজত দামৰ পাৰ্থক্য চাবলৈ ৱিকিপিডিয়া কোনো মূল্য তুলনা সেৱা নহয় ।
  6. সালসলনি সূচী বা মুক্তি টোকা । কোনো সামগ্ৰীৰ বিষয়ে এটা প্ৰৱন্ধত ইয়াৰ বিকাশৰ ইতিহাস আৰু প্ৰধান উন্নীতকৰণৰ তথ্য থাকিব লাগে । কিন্তু প্ৰতিটো মুক্তি বা নৱীকৰণৰ উল্লেখ এৰাই চলক ।
  7. অনা-বিশ্বকোষীয় শ্ৰেণীকৰণ, যেনে "X প্ৰতিষ্ঠানে মৰকল কৰা Y ধৰ্মীয়/সাংস্কৃতিক গোটৰ মানুহ" । সাংস্কৃতিকভাৱে গুৰুত্বপূৰ্ণ পৰিঘটনা নোহোৱালৈকে এনে ধৰণৰ প্ৰস্থ-শ্ৰেণীক নতুন প্ৰৱন্ধ সৃষ্টিৰ বাবে উল্লেখযোগ্য বুলি গণ্য কৰা নহয় । অধিক তথ্যৰ বাবে ৱিকিপিডিয়া:অতি-শ্ৰেণীকৰণ চাওক ।
  8. সকলো সম্ভাব্য তথ্যৰ বিশদ বিৱৰণ । প্ৰৱন্ধ এটা ইয়াৰ বিষয়বস্তুৰ ওপৰত গ্ৰহণীয় জ্ঞানৰ সাৰাংশ হোৱা উচিত [3]।

ৱিকিপিডিয়া কোনো হাতপুথি, প্ৰসংগপুথি, পাঠ্যপুথি বা বৈজ্ঞানিক গৱেষণাপত্ৰ নহয়

নীতিৰ সংক্ষিপ্ত:
WP:GAMEGUIDE
WP:NOTCASE
WP:NOTGUIDE
WP:NOTHOW
WP:NOTHOWTO
WP:NOT#JARGON
WP:NOTMANUAL
WP:NOT PAPERS
WP:NOTRECIPE
WP:NOTTEXTBOOK

Wikipedia is an encyclopedic reference, not an instruction manual, guidebook, or textbook. Wikipedia articles should not read like:

  1. Instruction manuals. While Wikipedia has descriptions of people, places and things, an article should not read like a "how-to" style owners manual, advice column (legal, medical or otherwise) or suggestion box. This includes tutorials, walk-throughs, instruction manuals, game guides, and recipes.[4] If you are interested in a "how-to" type of manual, you may want to look at wikiHow, How to Wiki or our sister project, Wikibooks.
  2. Travel guides. An article on Paris should mention landmarks, such as the Eiffel Tower and the Louvre, but not the telephone number or street address of your favorite hotel, nor the current price of a café au lait on the Champs-Élysées. Wikipedia is not the place to recreate content more suited to entries in hotel or culinary guides, travelogues, and the like. Notable locations may meet the inclusion criteria, but the resulting articles need not include every tourist attraction, restaurant, hotel or venue, etc. Such details may be welcome at Wikitravel or Wikia travel instead.
  3. Video game guides. An article about a computer game or video game should summarize the main actions the player does to win the game. But avoid lists of gameplay weapons, items, or concepts. Detailed coverage of specific point values, achievements, time-limits, levels, types of enemies, character moves, character weight classes, and so on are also considered inappropriate. A concise summary is appropriate if it is essential to understanding the game or its significance in the industry. See WP:VGSCOPE.
  4. Internet guides. Wikipedia articles should not exist only to describe the nature, appearance or services a website offers, but should also describe the site in an encyclopedic manner, offering detail on a website's achievements, impact or historical significance, which can be kept significantly more up-to-date than most reference sources, since editors can incorporate new developments and facts as they are made known. See the Current events portal for examples.
  5. FAQs. Wikipedia articles should not list frequently asked questions (FAQs). Instead, format the information provided as neutral prose within the appropriate article(s).
  6. Textbooks and annotated texts. Wikipedia is an encyclopedic reference, not a textbook. The purpose of Wikipedia is to present facts, not to teach subject matter. It is not appropriate to create or edit articles that read as textbooks, with leading questions and systematic problem solutions as examples. These belong on our sister projects, such as Wikibooks, Wikisource, and Wikiversity. Other kinds of examples, specifically those intended to inform rather than to instruct, may be appropriate for inclusion in a Wikipedia article.
  7. Scientific journals and research papers. A Wikipedia article should not be presented on the assumption that the reader is well versed in the topic's field. Introductory language in the lead and initial sections of the article should be written in plain terms and concepts that can be understood by any literate reader of Wikipedia without any knowledge in the given field before advancing to more detailed explanations of the topic. While wikilinks should be provided for advanced terms and concepts in that field, articles should be written on the assumption that the reader will not or cannot follow these links, instead attempting to infer their meaning from the text.
  8. Academic language. Texts should be written for everyday readers, not for academics. Article titles should reflect common usage, not academic terminology, whenever possible.
  9. Case studies. Many topics are based on the relationship of factor X to factor Y, resulting in one or more full articles. For example, this could refer to situation X in location Y, or version X of item Y. This is perfectly acceptable when the two variables put together represent some culturally significant phenomenon or some otherwise notable interest. Often, separate articles are needed for a subject within a range of different countries, due to substantial differences across international borders; articles such as "Slate industry in Wales" and "Island Fox" are fitting examples. Writing about "Oak trees in North Carolina" or a "Blue truck", however, would likely constitute a POV fork or মৌলিক গৱেষণা, and would certainly not result in an encyclopedic article.

ৱিকিপিডিয়া ভৱিষ্যতবাণী কৰা জাদুৰ বল নহয়

নীতিৰ সংক্ষিপ্ত:
WP:BALL
WP:CBALL
WP:CRYSTAL
WP:FUTURE
WP:NOTCRYSTAL
WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL
WP:SPECULATION

Wikipedia is not a collection of অপ্ৰমাণিত speculation. All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred. It is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur, if discussion is properly referenced. It is not appropriate for editors to insert নিজা মতামত আৰু বিশ্লেষণ. Predictions, speculation, forecasts and theories stated by reliable, expert sources or recognized entities in a field may be included, though editors should be aware of creating undue bias to any specific point-of-view. In forward-looking articles about unreleased products, such as films and games, take special care to avoid advertising and unverified claims (for films, see WP:NFF). In particular:

  1. Individual scheduled or expected future events should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place. Dates are not definite until the event actually takes place. If preparation for the event is not already in progress, speculation about it must be well documented. Examples of appropriate topics include the 2012 U.S. presidential election and 2020 Summer Olympics. By comparison, the 2020 U.S. presidential election and 2036 Summer Olympics are not appropriate article topics if nothing can be said about them that is verifiable and not original research. Avoid predicted sports team line-ups, which are inherently unverifiable and speculative. A schedule of future events may be appropriate if it can be verified. As an exception, even highly speculative articles about events that may or may not occur far in the future might be appropriate, where coverage in reliable sources is sufficient. For example, ultimate fate of the universe is an acceptable topic.
  2. Individual items from a predetermined list or a systematic pattern of names, pre-assigned to future events or discoveries, are not suitable article topics, if only generic information is known about the item. Lists of tropical cyclone names is encyclopedic; "Tropical Storm Alberto (2012)" is not, even though it is virtually certain that a storm of that name will occur in the North Atlantic and will turn counterclockwise. Similarly, articles about words formed on a predictable numeric system (such as "septenquinquagintillion") are not encyclopedic unless they are defined on good authority, or genuinely in use. Certain scientific extrapolations are considered to be encyclopedic, such as chemical elements documented by IUPAC before isolation in the laboratory.
  3. Articles that present original research in the form of extrapolation, speculation, and "future history" are inappropriate. While scientific and cultural norms continually evolve, we must wait for this evolution to happen, rather than try to predict it. Of course, we do and should have articles about notable artistic works, essays, or credible research that embody predictions. An article on Weapons of Star Trek is appropriate; an article on "Weapons to be used in World War III" is not.
  4. While currently accepted scientific paradigms may later be rejected, and hypotheses previously held to be controversial or incorrect sometimes become accepted by the scientific community, it is not the place of Wikipedia to venture such projections.
  5. Wikipedia is not a collection of product announcements and rumors. While Wikipedia includes up-to-date knowledge about newly revealed products, short articles that consist only of product announcement information are not appropriate. Until such time that more encyclopedic knowledge about the product can be verified, product announcements should be merged to a larger topic (such as an article about the creator(s), a series of products, or a previous product) if applicable. Speculation and rumor, even from reliable sources, are not appropriate encyclopedic content.

ৱিকিপিডিয়া কোনো বাতৰিকাকত নহয়

নীতিৰ সংক্ষিপ্ত:
WP:NOT#JOURNALISM
WP:NOT#NEWS
WP:NOTNEWS
WP:NOTWHOSWHO
অতিৰিক্ত তথ্যৰ বাবে: Wikipedia:Notability (events)

Not all verifiable events are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Ensure that Wikipedia articles are not:

  1. Journalism. Wikipedia should not offer first-hand news reports on breaking stories. Wikipedia is not a primary source. However, our sister projects Wikisource and Wikinews do exactly that, and are intended to be primary sources. Wikipedia does have many encyclopedia articles on topics of historical significance that are currently in the news, and can be updated with recently verified information.
  2. News reports. Wikipedia considers the enduring উল্লেখযোগ্যতা of persons and events. While news coverage can be useful source material for encyclopedic topics, most newsworthy events do not qualify for inclusion. For example, routine news reporting on things like announcements, sports, or celebrities is not a sufficient basis for inclusion in the encyclopedia. While including information on recent developments is sometimes appropriate, breaking news should not be emphasized or otherwise treated differently from other information. Timely news subjects not suitable for Wikipedia may be suitable for our sister project Wikinews. See also: ৱিকিপিডিয়া:উল্লেখযোগ্যতা (পৰিঘটনা)
  3. Who's who. Even when an event is notable, individuals involved in it may not be. Unless news coverage of an individual goes beyond the context of a single event, our coverage of that individual should be limited to the article about that event, in proportion to their importance to the overall topic. (See Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons for more details.)

ৱিকিপিডিয়া কোনো বাচ-বিচাৰহীন তথ্যৰ সংগ্ৰহ নহয়

নীতিৰ সংক্ষিপ্ত:
WP:IINFO
WP:INDISCRIMINATE
WP:NOTLYRICS
WP:NOT#LYRICS
WP:NOT#STATS
WP:PLOT
অতিৰিক্ত তথ্যৰ বাবে: Wikipedia:Notability

As explained in the policy introduction, merely being true, or even বিশ্বাসযোগ্য, does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Wikipedia articles should not be:

  1. Summary-only description of works. Wikipedia treats fiction in an encyclopedic manner, discussing the reception and significance of notable works in addition to a concise summary. For more information regarding plot summaries, see ৱিকিপিডিয়া:ৰচনাশৈলীৰ হাতপুথি (writing about fiction)#Plot summaries. Similarly, articles on works of non-fiction, including documentaries, research books and papers, religious texts, and the like, should contain more than a recap or summary of the works' contents.
  2. Lyrics databases. Most song lyrics published after 1922 are protected by copyright, and any quotation of them must be kept to a minimum, and used for the purpose of direct commentary or to illustrate some aspect of the style. For songs in the public domain the article should not consist solely of the lyrics (Wikisource should be used for such articles instead), but should instead provide information about authorship, date of publication, social impact, and so on. Quotations from an out-of-copyright song should be kept to a reasonable length relative to the rest of the article, and used to facilitate discussion, or to illustrate the style; the full text can be put on Wikisource and linked to from the article. Never link to the lyrics of copyrighted songs unless the site linked to clearly has the right to distribute the work. See Wikipedia:Do not include the full text of lengthy primary sources for full discussion.
  3. Excessive listing of statistics. Long and sprawling lists of statistics may be confusing to readers and reduce the readability and neatness of our articles. In addition, articles should contain sufficient explanatory text to put statistics within the article in their proper context for a general reader. In cases where this may be necessary, (e.g. Nationwide opinion polling for the United States presidential election, 2008), consider using tables to enhance the readability of lengthy data lists.

ৱিকিপিডিয়া চেন্সৰকৃত নহয়

নীতিৰ সংক্ষিপ্ত:
WP:CENSOR
WP:CENSORED
WP:NOTCENSORED
অতিৰিক্ত তথ্যৰ বাবে: Wikipedia:Profanity, Wikipedia:Sexual content, Wikipedia:No disclaimers in articles, Editing policy: Preserve information, Wikipedia:Options to not see an image, and Wikipedia:Wikipedia is comprehensive

Wikipedia may contain content that some readers consider objectionable or offensive, even exceedingly so (see Wikipedia:Content disclaimer). Wikipedia cannot guarantee that articles or images will always be acceptable to all readers, or that they will adhere to general social or religious norms.

Since anyone can edit an article and most changes made are displayed immediately, inappropriate material may appear before it can be removed. Content which is obviously inappropriate (such as an irrelevant link to a shock site, or clear vandalism) is usually removed quickly. Content that is judged to violate Wikipedia's জীৱিত ব্যক্তিৰ জীৱনী policy, or that violates other ৱিকিপিডিয়া নীতিসমূহ (especially নিৰপেক্ষ দৃষ্টিভংগী) or the laws of the U.S. state of Florida where Wikipedia's main servers are hosted, will also be removed.

However, some articles may include text, images, or links which some people may find objectionable, when these materials are relevant to the content. Discussion of potentially objectionable content should not focus on its offensiveness but on whether it is appropriate to include in a given article. Beyond that, "being objectionable" is generally not sufficient grounds for removal of content.

Nor will Wikipedia remove content because the internal bylaws of some organizations forbid that information to be displayed online. Any rules that forbid members of a given organization, fraternity, or religion to show a name or image do not apply to Wikipedia because Wikipedia is not a member of those organizations.

ৱিকিপিডিয়া সম্প্ৰদায়

The above policies are about Wikipedia's content. The following policies apply to Wikipedia's governance and processes.

ৱিকিপিডিয়া কোনো নৈৰাজ্য নহয়

নীতিৰ সংক্ষিপ্ত:
WP:NOTANARCHY
WP:NOTFREESPEECH
অতিৰিক্ত তথ্য: m:Power structure

Wikipedia is free and open, but restricts both freedom and openness where they interfere with creating an encyclopedia. Accordingly, Wikipedia is not a forum for unregulated free speech. The fact that Wikipedia is an open, self-governing project does not mean that any part of its purpose is to explore the viability of anarchistic communities. Our purpose is to build an encyclopedia, not to test the limits of anarchism.

ৱিকিপিডিয়া কোনো গণতন্ত্ৰ নহয়

নীতিৰ সংক্ষিপ্ত:
WP:DEMOCRACY
WP:NOT#DEM
WP:NOTDEMOCRACY
অতিৰিক্ত তথ্যৰ বাবে: Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion

Wikipedia is not an experiment in democracy or any other political system. Its primary but not exclusive method of determining ঐকমত্য is through editing and discussion, not voting. Although editors occasionally use straw polls in an attempt to test for consensus, polls or surveys sometimes impede rather than assist discussion.

Straw votes should be used with caution, and are no more binding than any other consensus decision. Elections and votes are only endorsed for things that take place outside Wikipedia proper, such as when electing the Arbitration Committee.

ৱিকিপিডিয়া কোনো আমোলাতন্ত্ৰ নহয়

নীতিৰ সংক্ষিপ্ত:
WP:BURO
WP:NOTBUREAUCRACY
WP:NOTBUREAU
WP:NOTLAW
WP:NOTSTATUTE
"WP:BURO" নামৰ পৃষ্ঠাই ইয়ালৈ পুনৰ্নিদেশ কৰিছে। the "bureaucrat" user access levelৰ বাবে, WP:CRAT চাওক।

While Wikipedia has many elements of a bureaucracy,[5] it is not governed by statute: it is not a moot court, and rules are not the purpose of the community. Written rules do not themselves set accepted practice. Rather, they document already existing community consensus regarding what should be accepted and what should be rejected. When instruction creep is found to have occurred, it should be removed.

While Wikipedia's written নীতি আৰু পথনিৰ্দেশিকাসমূহ should be taken seriously, they can be misused. Do not follow an overly strict interpretation of the letter of policy without consideration for the principles of policies. If the rules truly prevent you from improving the encyclopedia, সেইবোৰ উপেক্ষা কৰক. Disagreements are resolved through ঐকমত্য-ভিত্তিক discussion, rather than through tightly sticking to rules and procedures. Furthermore, policies and guidelines themselves may be changed to reflect evolving consensus.

A procedural error made in a proposal or request is not grounds for rejecting that proposal or request.

ৱিকিপিডিয়া কোনো ৰণভূমি নহয়

নীতিৰ সংক্ষিপ্ত:
WP:BATTLEGROUND
WP:NOTBATTLE
WP:NOTBATTLEGROUND
WP:NOTFACTIONS
WP:BATTLE
অতিৰিক্ত তথ্যৰ বাবে: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not about winning

Wikipedia is not a place to hold grudges, import personal conflicts, carry on ideological battles, or nurture prejudice, hatred, or fear. Making personal battles out of Wikipedia discussions goes directly against our policies and goals. In addition to avoiding battles in discussions, do not make changes to content or policies just to prove a point to someone with whom you disagree.

Every user is expected to interact with others শিষ্টাচাৰ, calmly, and in a spirit of cooperation. Do not insult, harass, or intimidate those with whom you have a disagreement. Rather, approach the matter intelligently and engage in polite discussion. If another user behaves in an uncivil, uncooperative, or insulting manner, or even tries to harass or intimidate you, this does not give you an excuse to respond in kind. Address only the factual points brought forward, ignoring the inappropriate comments, or disregard that user entirely. If necessary, point out gently that you think the comments might be considered uncivil, and make it clear that you want to move on and focus on the content issue. If a conflict continues to bother you, take advantage of Wikipedia's মতবিৰোধ সমাধান process. There are always users willing to mediate and arbitrate disputes between others.

In large disputes, resist the urge to turn Wikipedia into a battleground between factions. ভাল ভাৱ ৰাখক that every editor and group is here to improve Wikipedia—especially if they hold a point of view with which you disagree. Work with whomever you like, but do not organize a faction with the main goal of disrupting Wikipedia’s fundamental decision-making process, which is based on building a ঐকমত্য. Editors in large disputes should work in good faith to find broad principles of agreement between different viewpoints.

Do not use Wikipedia to make আইনী or other threats against Wikipedia, Wikipedians, or the Wikimedia Foundation—other means already exist to communicate legal problems.[6] Threats are not tolerated and may result in a ban.

ৱিকিপিডিয়া বাধ্যতামূলক নহয়

নীতিৰ সংক্ষিপ্ত:
WP:NOTCOMPULSORY

ৱিকিপিডিয়া এখন স্বেচ্ছাসেৱকৰ সমাজ | ইয়াত ৱিকিপিডিয়ানে ইচ্ছা কৰাতকৈ অধিক সময় আৰু প্ৰচেষ্টা খৰচ কৰাৰ প্ৰয়োজন নাই | আন ৱিকিপিডিয়ানৰ পৰা অধিক দাবী কৰাতকৈ ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ উন্নিতকৰণতহে গুৰুত্ব দিয়া উচিত | বিশেষকৈ ব্যৱহাৰ বা আচৰণৰ ক্ষেত্ৰত সম্পাদকসকলে ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ নীতিসমূহ মানি চলা উচিত | কিন্তু যিকোনো সময়ত সম্পাদকে বিৰতি ল’ব পাৰে বা ৱিকিপিডিয়া এৰি যাব পাৰে |

আৰু শেষত...

নীতিৰ সংক্ষিপ্ত:
WP:BADIDEA
WP:NOTSTUPID

Wikipedia is not any of a very long list of terrible ideas. We cannot anticipate every bad idea any one of us might have. Almost everything on this page made it here because somebody managed to come up with some new bad idea that had not previously been anticipated. (See WP:BEANS—it is in fact strongly discouraged to anticipate them.) In general, "that is a terrible idea" is always sufficient grounds to avoid doing something, provided there is a good reason that the idea is terrible.

আপুনি যদি বিবুধিত পৰিছে

এটা প্ৰৱন্ধত কি থাকিব বা নাথাকিব লাগে তাক লৈ যদি চিন্তাত পৰিছে, তেন্তে নিজকে প্ৰশ্ন কৰক যে এজন সাধাৰণ পঢ়ুৱৈয়ে এখন বিশ্বকোষত সেই শিৰোনামাৰে কি বিচাৰিব | ৱিকিপিডিয়া:বিলোপনযোগী প্ৰৱন্ধ/সাধাৰণ ফলাফল আনুষ্ঠানিক নীতি নহয়, কিন্তু অতীতত কি ধৰণৰ প্ৰৱন্ধ বিশ্বকোষৰ উপযোগী বুলি বিবেচিত হৈছে বা নাইহোৱা সেইটো ঠিৰাং কৰাত সহায় কৰিব |

আপুনি যদি ওপৰত দিয়া কোনো নিয়ম উলঙ্ঘা কৰা হৈছে বুলি ভাবিছে, তেন্তে:

  • প্ৰৱন্ধটোৰ বিষয়বস্তু সলনি কৰক (সাধাৰণ সম্পাদনা) |
  • ইতিহাস সংৰক্ষণ কৰি পৃষ্ঠাখন পুনৰ্নিৰ্দেশ হিছাপে ৰাখক |
  • যদি পৃষ্ঠাখনে বিলোপন নীতিৰ চৰ্তসমূহ পূৰণ কৰিছে, সেইখনক বিলোপনৰ বাবে প্ৰস্তাৱ কৰক | কি ধৰণৰ অৱদান বিলোপ কৰা হ’ব পাৰে সেয়া জানিবলৈ আপুনি তাৰ আলোচনাত নিয়মীয়াকৈ ভাগ ল’ব লাগিব |
  • আন আন ৱিকিপিডিয়ানৰ সৈতে কথা-বতৰা পৃষ্ঠাৰ জৰিয়তে আলোচনা কৰি ঐকমত্যত উপনীত হ’লে এই পৃষ্ঠাখনৰ নিয়মাৱলী সলনি কৰক | নতুন বিকল্প যোগ দিওঁতে অনুগ্ৰহ কৰি যিমান পাৰি খোলোচা হওক আৰু একেধৰণৰ, অনুমোদিত বিষয়ৰ প্ৰতি-উদাহৰণ দিয়ক |

আৰু চাওক

টোকা

  1. ↑ ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ পৃষ্ঠাসমূহ ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ লগত সম্পৰ্ক নথকা বিষয়ৰ ওকালতিৰ বাবে ব্যৱহাৰ কৰিব নোৱাৰি । কিন্তু ৱিকিপিডিয়া নামস্থানত থকা পৃষ্ঠাসমূহ ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ উন্নতিসাধনৰ বিচৰা নিৰ্দিষ্ট দৃষ্টিকোণৰ বাবে ব্যৱহাৰ কৰিব পাৰি । সেইবাবে ৱিকিপিডিয়া সম্পৰ্কীয় লিখনী, প্ৰকল্প পৃষ্ঠা, প’ৰ্টেল আদি ৱ্কিপিডিয়াৰ অংশ বুলি গণ্য কৰা হ’ব ।
  2. ↑ এই বিধি আভ্যন্তৰীন সংগঠনৰ কামত ব্যৱহাৰ হোৱা বা উল্লেখযোগ্য বিষয় বৰ্ণনা কৰা ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ প্ৰৱন্ধত থকা সংযোগৰ তালিকাৰ ক্ষেত্ৰত প্ৰযোজ্য নহয়
  3. ↑ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Rex071404 চাওক
  4. ↑ The how-to restriction does not apply to the project namespace, where "how-to"s relevant to editing Wikipedia itself are appropriate, such as Wikipedia:How to draw a diagram with Dia. Also, in the মূল নামস্থান, describing to the reader how other people or things use something is encyclopedic; instructing the reader in the imperative mood about how to use something is not.
  5. ↑ Joseph Michael Reagle, Jr.; Lawrence Lessig (30 September 2010). Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia. MIT Press. পৃষ্ঠা. 90-91. ISBN 9780262014472. http://books.google.com/books?id=ml7SlTq8XvIC&pg=PA90। আহৰণ কৰা হৈছে: 30 June 2011. 
  6. ↑ If you believe that your legal rights are being violated, you may discuss this with other users involved, take the matter to the appropriate mailing list, contact the Wikimedia Foundation, or in cases of স্বত্বাধিকাৰ violations notify us at Wikipedia:Contact us/Article problem/Copyright.

বৰ্হিসংযোগ

Similar official policies on sister projects

সহায়ক তথ্য

প্ৰ • আ • স
ৱিকিপিডিয়া নীতিসমূহ
   

পাঁচটা স্তম্ভ
আমাৰ নীতিসমূহৰ বিষয়ে বিবৃতি

জিম্ব’ৰ বিবৃতি
ঐতিহাসিক নীতিসমূহ

সৰলীকৃত নিয়মাৱলী
আমাৰ বিধিসমূহৰ সাৰাংশ

ৱিকিমিডিয়া নীতিসমূহ
সকলো প্ৰকল্পৰ বাবে উমৈহতীয়া
(মেটা-ৱিকিত)

নীতিসমূহ
ৱিকিপিডিয়াৰ নীতিৰ বিষয়ে আন প্ৰৱন্ধসমূহ

প্ৰ • আ • স
আলোকপাত
প্ৰকল্প নীতিসমূহ
মূল বিষয়বস্তু নীতি
আন বিষয়বস্তু নীতিসমূহ
বিষয়বস্তু পথনিৰ্দেশিকাসমূহ
আচৰণ নীতি
ব্যৱহাৰিক পথনিৰ্দেশিকাসমূহ
সম্পাদনা পথনিৰ্দেশিকাসমূহ
শৈলীৰ পথনিৰ্দেশিকাসমূহ
শ্ৰেণীবিভাজন পথনিৰ্দেশিকাসমূহ
"https://as.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ৱিকিপিডিয়া:ৱিকিপিডিয়া_কি_নহয়&oldid=25275"ৰ পৰা অনা হৈছে