বাৰ্তা:মামণি ৰয়ছম গোস্বামী

কেইটামান লিংক থৈ দিওঁ। কামত আহিব।

• http://indiragoswami.blogspot.com/
• http://www.indiablooms.com/NewsDetailsPage/2011/newsDetails291111l.php
• http://www.sentinelassam.com/ghy_city/story.php?sec=2&subsec=4&id=98347&dtP=2011-11-29&ppr=1
• http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_indira-goswami-s-prolific-pen-campaigned-for-dignity-of-human-beings_1618825
• http://www.loc.gov/acq/ovop/delhi/salrp/indiragoswami.html
• http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/indira-goswami-a-writer-peace-broker-and-teacher/1/162031.html
• http://www.mombu.com/culture/pakistan/t-dr-indira-goswami-assams-fiery-pen-5450308.html

অনুচ্ছেদ

প্ৰভাকৰ দা, অনুচ্ছেদবোৰৰ ক্ৰম ঠিক কৰি দিয়ক।

• শিক্ষা আৰু কৰ্মজীৱন
• ব্যক্তিগত জীৱন

বৃন্দাবনৰ জীৱন

• অৱদান

সাহিত্যিক

উপন্যাস

চুটিগল্প

আত্মজীৱনী

অনুদিত

গৱেষণা

সামাজিক

শান্তিদূত

• বঁটা আৰু সন্মান
• মৃত্যু

‍‍Gitartha.bordoloi 17:05, 29 নভেম্বৰ 2011 (UTC)

Depression

Sure, I'll do it. But before we write anything about the much talked topic of her depression, I'd like to hear your (and other wikipedian's) opinion about it.

1. I am sorry that I locked the page, but I had to. We need to reach a consensus about her "depression". So I wanted to make sure to go through this topic by gathering whatever information information so that I can present here for discussion.

2. I feel that it is not right to put so much importance on this topic so as to highlight it. My reasons are as follows:

• Be sensitive: Mental disease is a taboo in our society, we all know it. Again, woman is the most spicy topic of discussion. So, is it civil to put these two topics together? I remember, seeing a video of Dr Bhupen Hazarika in hospital without his cap, Bishnu Saikia and many others objected that we should not present the maestro without it exposing beld head, it is inappropriate.

• Be sensible: Depression is a disease. A disease needs a doctor to diagnose. Do we have a doctor's opinion about it chronicled somewhere? One might argue, that "she herself wrote it", "people close to he wrote it", "if Mr X, who said it, will not tell a lie or mistaken" etc. My counter: do we recognize a person having cancer just by his looks? No. Does the person himself recognize it because it is his body? No. So what we have here to prove it? In fact, most probably there will be people who would rather think otherwise. See the next point.

• Be reasonable: Mamoni Raisom is a world class writer, as Bhupen Hazarika was in his domain. Fame, has its curses too. We are human beings. Some of us, consciously or subconsciously, envy people overtaking us, more so when he/she is our competitor. Further, some of those people will go to any length to demean the person. And character assassination is the cheapest and easiest of them.

• Preserve Dignity: It is not appropriate to discuss a differently able person's disabilities. De we talk about Stefan Hawkings's disability or we talk about his great work? [Quiz: How much do you know about the world's beast scientist's personnel life?]

So here I conclude: Let us not reach conclusions about a person's personal traits unless we have concrete, documentary or consensual evidence, especially so when it never harmed anybody. We should present it the following way, as the Prince Claus Award jury judged:-

“ Indira Goswami, in the judgement of the Prince Claus Award jury, is an outstanding writer who reveals the lived experience of ordinary people. Through powerful graphic descriptions and haunting images she shows how central the body is in human affairs, how political, religious and cultural systems are codified through the body; and how life process, gender, age, poverty and conflict are defined physically. A woman of remarkable insight and conviction, Indira Goswami (Mamoni Roisom Goswami as she is popularly known) is honoured for the unique quality of her writing, for identifying and expressing the inscription of cultural norms in the body, and for her influential social and cultural activism through literature. ” — Prince Claus Award jury

প্রভাকৰ শৰ্মা নেওগ 05:41, 30 নভেম্বৰ 2011 (UTC)

Please write your views preferably in English below:

I feel her biography will be incomplete without that particular topic. Bhupen Hazarika never wanted to photographed him without his cap but Mamoni baideu was pretty open about her depression and suicidal attempts in "Adha likha dastabej". I also have a copy her interview with Homen Borgohain about similar discussion. It was a major stimulant for her writings. Gitartha.bordoloi 08:30, 30 নভেম্বৰ 2011 (UTC)

Due to lake of relevant documents in this matter, I am not able to help at this time. If I able to collect the data, certainly I'll update in this page. বিষ্ণু শইকীয়া 08:26, 30 নভেম্বৰ 2011 (UTC)

You are right (Gitartha). That's why we need to express this issue very carefully and have to be neutral, without expressing any bias. Yes, I also feel that what she had faced in her life is very unfair and my heart melts for her in compassion. However at the same time, we'll have to remember4 that we must not let our writings offer pity to this couragious woman - it would be a pity for her. That's why, I want to finish my piece and then hand it over to you. Then you will add, subtract your view in the same manner. But please don't alter the order of the sections, in fact it is taking me hours just to write a single paragraph. Please agree with me, will you?

প্রভাকৰ শৰ্মা নেওগ 10:02, 30 নভেম্বৰ 2011 (UTC)

ok. But her literary & research works works don't fit under "ব্যক্তিগত জীৱন" section. We can put them under "অৱদান"। ‍Gitartha.bordoloi 11:25, 30 নভেম্বৰ 2011 (UTC)

I've already noted. Please see the structure now. Do you think we should give more prominence to her role of a mediator in peace process? Because in the writings about it in veryous sites writer's opinion seems to be many. You decide on it.

Should we keep these lists on the article? Let's use the "list" feature. Another interesting set of templates are the "timelines". Probably we can ask Amlan.

প্রভাকৰ শৰ্মা নেওগ 11:51, 30 নভেম্বৰ 2011 (UTC)

"শান্তি আলোচনা"ৰ কথা অলপ বহলাই লিখিব পাৰি। কিতাপ কেইখনৰ বিষয়ে বহলাই লিখিব নালাগে, সেইবোৰৰ নিজা নিজা প্ৰবন্ধ কৰিব পাৰি। তালিকা মানে বঁটা আৰু গ্ৰন্থ? ইয়াতে ৰখাই ভাল হ'ব নেকি। এজন ব্যক্তিৰ বিষয়ে তালিকা সৃষ্টি কৰা মই ইংৰাজী ৱিকিত দেখা নাই। আনহাতে যিহেতু এই প্ৰবন্ধটো আছেই, গতিকে ইংৰাজী ৱিকিৰ মতে "timelines"ৰ বেলেগকৈ প্ৰবন্ধ থাকিব নালাগে। সেইখিনি তথ্য আমি ইয়াতো ঠায়ে ঠায়ে উল্লেখ কৰিব পাৰোঁ।

Gitartha.bordoloi 15:56, 30 নভেম্বৰ 2011 (UTC)

Try this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3APrefixIndex&prefix=Timeline&namespace=0 প্রভাকৰ শৰ্মা নেওগ 08:11, 1 ডিচেম্বৰ 2011 (UTC)

চালোঁ। কোনো ব্যক্তিবিশেষৰ timeline নাই তাত। Gitartha.bordoloi 09:08, 1 ডিচেম্বৰ 2011 (UTC)

তেন্তে কলাপ্‌চিবল লিষ্ট ব্যবহাৰ কৰিব লাগিব।

মোৰ লিখা শেষ হ'ল (দৰকাৰীখিনি) বাকি লাহে লাহে হৈ থাকিব।

প্রভাকৰ শৰ্মা নেওগ 12:08, 1 ডিচেম্বৰ 2011 (UTC)

নাম সংশোধন

মামণি ৰয়চম গোস্বামী => মামণি ৰয়ছম গোস্বামী (ছ) হ’ব লাগে|

Bishnu Saikia বিষ্ণু শইকীয়া 14:47, 1 ডিচেম্বৰ 2011 (UTC)