সাঁচ:Refimprove
 | এই প্ৰবন্ধটোৰ সত্যাপনযোগ্যতা প্ৰমাণ কৰিবলৈ অধিক তথ্য-উৎসৰ প্ৰয়োজন। অনুগ্ৰহ কৰি বিশ্বাসযোগ্য উৎসৰ উল্লেখ কৰি প্ৰবন্ধটো উন্নত কৰাত সহায় কৰক। কিয়নো তথ্যৰ উৎসৰ উল্লেখ নকৰা প্ৰবন্ধক লৈ প্ৰশ্ন উঠিব পাৰে। অনুগ্ৰহ কৰি আলোচনা পৃষ্ঠাতো এই সম্পৰ্কীয় কিবা তথ্যৰ বাবে চক ফুৰাব।
অধিক সহায়ৰ বাবে কাষৰ "[দেখুৱাওক]" লিংকটোত ক্লিক কৰক।
উদ্ধৃতিৰ প্ৰয়োজনীয়তা এইবাবেই যে ৱিকিপিডিয়াত ব্যক্তিগত গৱেষণালব্ধ তথ্য গ্ৰহণযোগ্য নহয়, যদিহে ই কোনো নিৰ্ভৰযোগ্য উৎসৰ পৰা আহৰণ কৰা নহয়। মনত ৰাখিব যে ভুল তথ্যৰ বাবে পঢ়ুৱৈৰ ক্ষতিসাধন হ'ব পাৰে। তথাপিতো অসমীয়া ৱিকিপিডিয়া সৰু বাবে অনেক ক্ষেত্ৰত ঢিলাই দিয়া হয় বা কেতিয়াবা কেতিয়াবা দায়িত্বশীল সম্পাদকসকলৰ চকুৰ পৰা সাৰি যায় - তেতিয়া আপুনিয়েই প্ৰথম শাৰীত {{Reimprove}} বা {{Verify}} বুলি লিখি দিয়ে যেন। আনহাতে (অফলাইন) আলোচনীৰ বা বাতৰি কাকতৰ পৰা সহায় লৈ লিখা এটা প্ৰবন্ধৰ উত্সৰ সত্যতা নিৰূপন কৰিবৰ বাবে গৰিষ্ঠ সংখ্যক পাঠকৰ উপায় নাথাকে। তদুপৰি এই প্ৰক্ৰিয়াৰে কিছুমান দুষ্টলোকে ভুল ৰেফাৰেঞ্চৰেও পাঠকক দিগভ্ৰান্ত কৰি তুলিব পাৰে। অনলাইন উত্সৰ পৰা উদ্ধৃতিবোৰ দিলে এনে অসুবিধা নহয়। তেনে ক্ষেত্ৰত কোনোবাই আপত্তি কৰিলেও সত্যতা নিৰূপন কৰিবলৈ একো অসুবিধা নহয়। উল্লেখযোগ্য যে ব্যক্তিগত ব্লগৰ পৰা ৱিকিত উদ্ধৃতি দিয়া নিষেধ। |
 |
This template is used by the standard installation of Twinkle. If you are planning to make major changes to this template or nominate it for deletion, please notify Twinkle's user base and maintainers at Wikipedia talk:Twinkle as a courtesy. |
This template indicates that the article needs additional inline citations. This template should be used only for articles where there are some, but insufficient, inline citations. For articles that have no inline citations at all currently, use Template:Unreferenced. There is currently no consensus on where to place this template. Many editors understand this template to be redundant when it is used on articles clearly marked as stubs.
For articles about living persons, the more specific template {{BLP sources}} should be used instead.
Usage
A |talk= parameter is allowed; setting this to any value will result in the message "See talk page for details." being included in the tag.
This template also includes support for using the |date= parameter. Adding this parameter sorts the article into subcategories of Category:Articles needing additional references and out of the parent category, allowing the oldest problems to be identified and dealt with first. A bot will add this parameter if it is omitted. Be careful not to abbreviate the date, because then it will automatically add a redlinked category instead of the correct category. The simplest way to use this parameter manually is {{Refimprove|{{subst:DATE}}}} but it can be done more explicitly as {{Refimprove|date=November 2024}} (both result in the same output).
Listed below are four examples of usage:
{{Refimprove}}
{{Refimprove|date=November 2024}}
{{Refimprove|section}} (the same as {{Ref improve section}})
{{Refimprove|section|{{subst:DATE}}|talk=y}}
A user warning template, {{Uw-refimprove}}, is available to notify contributors that an article they created needs its referencing improved.
General advantage
- The naming scheme of Refimprove parallels that used for {{Refbegin}}, {{Refend}}, and {{Reflist}}, thereby reducing confusion, in compliance with the KISS principle.
Differences from related templates
Differences from {{BLP sources}}
- Use BLP sources in articles about living persons that need additional references. If the article need additional references but is not about a living or recently deceased subject, then use refimprove.
Differences from {{Unreferenced}} and {{Citation needed}}
- Use Unreferenced when there are no inline citations in an article. If there are one or more, but insufficient inline citations in an article, then use refimprove.
- However if an article has sufficient inline citations, but the article lacks citations to cover specific information (such as no citation on a quotation) then use the inline citation template {{citation needed}} to indicate more precisely where additional citations are needed. Unlike citation needed, refimprove places a very conspicuous banner in the article.
- There is also a
{{refimprove section}}and the normal variations.
Differences from {{Primary sources}}
- If an article has sufficient inline citations, but if the citations in an article are from primary sources or sources affiliated with the subject (see WP:PSTS), then use {{Primary sources}}.
Differences from {{Citation style}}
- The refimprove template is intended for use in articles that need additional citations, while citation style template is used to request consistency within the citations present in an article (see WP:CITEVAR). For example when there is a mixture of footnotes or parenthetical references.
Differences from {{No footnotes}}, {{More footnotes}}
- Refimprove can be used when there is no "References" or "Further reading" section in the article.
Redirects
Include:
- {{Ri}}
- {{Citations needed}}
- {{Citations missing}}
- {{Cite sources}}
- {{Cleanup-cite}}
- {{Cleanup-verify}}
- {{Cleanup cite}}
- {{Few references}}
- {{Few refs}}
- {{Fewreferences}}
- {{Fewrefs}}
- {{Improve-references}}
- {{Improve-refs}}
- {{Improve references}}
- {{Improve refs}}
- {{Improvereferences}}
- {{Improverefs}}
- {{Missing citations}}
- {{More references}}
- {{More sources}}
- {{Moreref}}
- {{Morereferences}}
- {{Morerefs}}
- {{Moresources}}
- {{Not verified}}
- {{Notverified}}
- {{Ref-improve}}
- {{Ref improve}}
- {{Reference-improve}}
- {{Sources}}
- {{Verification}}
- {{Verify}}
See also
| The above documentation is transcluded from সাঁচ:Refimprove/doc. (edit | history) Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox (create | mirror) and testcases (create) pages. Please add categories and interwikis to the /doc subpage. Subpages of this template. |